Intensive insulin therapy improves endothelial function and microvascular reactivity in young people with type 1
V L Franklin1, F Khan, G Kennedy
1Maternal and Child Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK. victoria.franklin@nhs.net
Insights
Intensive insulin therapy (IIT) improved endothelial function and vascular markers in children with type 1 diabetes. This vascular protection occurred independently of glycemic control changes, suggesting additional benefits beyond blood sugar management.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Endocrinology
- Cardiovascular Health in Diabetes
- Vascular Biology
Background:
- Macrovascular disease is a major complication in type 1 diabetes, starting in childhood.
- Vascular impairment in type 1 diabetes contributes to increased morbidity and mortality.
- Early intervention is crucial for managing long-term diabetic complications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of intensive diabetes management on endothelial function in children with type 1 diabetes.
- To assess if intensive insulin therapy (IIT) combined with 'Sweet Talk' support improves vascular health.
- To determine the effects of IIT versus conventional insulin therapy (CIT) on endothelial markers.
Main Methods:
- A randomized controlled trial involving 92 children (8-18 years) with type 1 diabetes.
- Participants were assigned to: CIT only, CIT with 'Sweet Talk', or IIT with 'Sweet Talk'.
- Vascular assessments and HbA1c levels were measured at baseline and after 12 months.
Main Results:
- Glycemic control worsened with CIT but improved significantly with IIT (p=0.007).
- IIT showed greater improvements in E-selectin (p<0.0001) compared to CIT.
- Vascular responses to acetylcholine improved with IIT (p=0.017), independent of HbA1c.
Conclusions:
- Intensive insulin therapy (IIT) demonstrates potential for conferring vascular protection in type 1 diabetes.
- Improvements in vascular markers with IIT occur independently of HbA1c levels.
- IIT may offer dual benefits: improved glycemic control and direct vascular health advantages.
Aims/Hypothesis:
Macrovascular disease is an important cause of the increased morbidity and mortality rates associated with type 1 diabetes, and this vascular impairment begins in childhood. The aim of this study was to determine whether introducing intensive diabetes management [intensive insulin therapy (IIT) and 'Sweet Talk' text-messaging support] produces measurable improvements in endothelial function.
Methods:
One hundred and twenty-six patients fulfilled the eligibility criteria (type 1 diabetes for >1 year; on conventional insulin therapy (CIT); aged between 8 and 18 years), of whom 92 enrolled. Patients were randomised to group 1, CIT only (n=28); group 2, CIT and Sweet Talk (n=33); or group 3, IIT and Sweet Talk (n=31). Vascular assessments (including measures of endothelial damage, activation, dysfunction and oxidative stress) and HbA1c were performed at baseline and repeated after 12 months of the study.
Results:
Glycaemic control deteriorated in patients on CIT, but improved significantly in patients allocated to IIT (p=0.007). IIT was associated with significantly greater improvements in E-selectin (p<0.0001) than CIT (group 1, p=0.026 and group 2, p=0.053). Vascular responses to acetylcholine improved in patients on IIT (p=0.017), but not in patients receiving CIT. These changes were all independent of HbA1c level.
Conclusions/Interpretation:
IIT appears to be associated with improvements in vascular markers, independently of changes in HbA1c, suggesting that IIT may confer vascular protection in addition to improving glycaemic control.
Related Concept Videos
Type I Diabetes II: Pathophysiology
Diabetes Mellitus: Overview and Type I Subtype
Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease in which the immune system mistakenly attacks and destroys the insulin-producing beta cells in the pancreas. As a result, the body is unable to produce sufficient insulin, and individuals with...
Insulin: Dosing Regimen and Adverse Effects
The basal dose constitutes about 40%-50% of the total daily dose, with the rest as premeal insulin. The mealtime insulin dose should mirror...
Type I Diabetes I: Introduction
Type I Diabetes III: Clinical Manifestations
Type II Diabetes II: Pathophysiology


