Related Experiment Videos
The Michigan surgical quality collaborative: will a statewide quality improvement initiative pay for itself?
Michael J Englesbe1, Justin B Dimick, Christopher J Sonnenday
1Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Objective:
In this article, we detail a unique collaboration between hospitals in Michigan and a major third party payer, using a "pay for participation model." The payer has made a significant investment in this regional surgical quality improvement (QI) program and funds each center's participation.
Results:
Based on the documented costs and incidence of surgical complications at our center, we estimate that a 1.8% annual reduction in complication rates is required for the payer to recoup its investment in this regional QI program. If we achieve our goal of a 3% reduction in complications per year over the 3-year program, the payer will save $2.5 million in payments. Our findings suggest that only a very modest improvement in surgical results, of a magnitude that seems realistically achievable based on similar QI initiatives, is necessary to financially justify payer involvement in a statewide quality improvement initiative.
Conclusion:
The framework of this program should be used by surgeons to attract private payers into QI collaboratives, facilitating improved patient outcomes and decreased health care expenditures.
Insights
A pay-for-participation model incentivizes surgical quality improvement (QI) programs. Modest complication rate reductions can financially justify payer investment, leading to better patient outcomes and lower healthcare costs.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Surgical Quality Improvement
- Healthcare Economics
Background:
- Regional surgical quality improvement (QI) programs require significant investment.
- Third-party payers are exploring innovative funding models for QI initiatives.
- A "pay for participation" model offers a unique approach to funding QI.
Purpose of the Study:
- To detail a novel collaboration between Michigan hospitals and a third-party payer using a pay-for-participation model.
- To assess the financial viability of payer investment in a regional surgical QI program.
- To demonstrate how payer involvement can drive improved surgical outcomes and reduced healthcare expenditures.
Main Methods:
- Implementation of a "pay for participation" model funded by a major third-party payer.
- Investment in a regional surgical quality improvement (QI) program across multiple hospitals.
- Analysis of documented costs and surgical complication rates to determine financial return on investment.
Main Results:
- An estimated 1.8% annual reduction in complication rates is needed for the payer to recoup investment.
- A 3% annual reduction in complications over 3 years could result in $2.5 million in payer savings.
- Modest, achievable improvements in surgical results can financially justify payer engagement in QI.
Conclusions:
- The pay-for-participation framework can attract private payers to QI collaboratives.
- This model facilitates improved patient outcomes and reduced healthcare spending.
- Surgeons can leverage this framework to foster collaborative quality improvement initiatives.
Related Concept Videos
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Nursing Clinical Information System
A Nursing Clinical Information System (NCIS) is a specialized type of healthcare information system tailored to meet the unique needs of nursing practice. It incorporates the principles of nursing informatics to streamline information management and improve the quality of care delivery.
Critical attributes of NCIS include:
Integrated Healthcare System
Secondary Healthcare System
Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is limited...