Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2026

In Silico Modeling Method for Computational Aquatic Toxicology of Endocrine Disruptors: A Software-Based Approach Using QSAR Toolbox
Published on: August 28, 2019
Bioconcentration factor hydrophobicity cutoff: an artificial phenomenon reconstructed
Michiel T O Jonker1, Stephan A Van der Heijden
1Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80177, 3508 TD Utrecht, The Netherlands. M.T.O.Jonker@uu.nl
Highly hydrophobic chemicals do not show a bioconcentration factor (BCF) cutoff. Artifacts in traditional BCF measurements obscure true uptake, suggesting a need to revise risk assessment and measurement techniques for very hydrophobic compounds.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Chemistry
- Ecotoxicology
- Bioconcentration Studies
Background:
- A hydrophobicity cutoff in bioconcentration factor (BCF) measurements for highly hydrophobic chemicals (log Kow > 5-6) is debated.
- This cutoff may stem from measurement artifacts or reduced membrane permeation of large molecules.
- The validity of current risk assessment models incorporating a BCF cutoff is questioned.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the existence of a hydrophobicity cutoff for highly hydrophobic organic chemicals.
- To identify and explain artifacts affecting BCF measurements.
- To propose revisions for BCF measurement techniques and risk assessment strategies.
Main Methods:
- Uptake of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Lumbriculus variegatus was measured.
- BCFs were determined using traditional batch uptake kinetics and alternative methods (SPME, POM-SPE, field exposures, dead worms, liposomes).
- Comparison of BCFs across different measurement approaches to identify discrepancies.
Main Results:
- A hydrophobicity cutoff was observed only with traditional BCF measurement approaches.
- Alternative methods did not show a hydrophobicity cutoff for compounds with log Kow up to 7.5.
- Artifacts, including third-phase effects and nonequilibrium conditions, were identified as causes for the observed cutoff in traditional methods.
Conclusions:
- The hydrophobicity cutoff effect in BCF measurements is likely an artifact, not a true biological limitation.
- Current BCF measurement techniques and risk assessment strategies for very hydrophobic chemicals require revision.
- Accurate assessment of bioconcentration for highly hydrophobic compounds necessitates improved methodologies that avoid artifacts.
Related Concept Videos
Conserved Binding Sites
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally analyses the...
Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules
Four types of noncovalent interactions are hydrogen bonds, van der Waals forces, ionic bonds, and hydrophobic interactions.
Hydrogen bonding results from the electrostatic attraction of a hydrogen atom covalently bonded to a strong-electronegative atom like oxygen,...
