Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2026

Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
Clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients with atherothrombosis: CAPRIE-based calculation of cost-effectiveness for
K Berger1, F Hessel, J Kreuzer
1University Hospital Munich, Department of Hemostaseology and Transfusion Medicine, Economic Working Group, Ziemssenstrasse 1, D-80336 Munich, Germany. Karin.Berger@med.uni-muenchen.de
Insights
Clopidogrel significantly reduces vascular events and deaths compared to aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) in German patients with cardiovascular conditions. The cost per life-year saved is estimated between €14,380 and €18,790, considered acceptable for German payers.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacoeconomics
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Health Technology Assessment
Background:
- Secondary prevention of atherothrombotic events is crucial for patients with myocardial infarction (MI), ischaemic stroke (IS), or peripheral arterial disease (PAD).
- Comparing the cost-effectiveness of clopidogrel versus aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) (ASS) is essential for healthcare resource allocation in Germany.
Purpose of the Study:
- To model the 2-year cost-effectiveness of clopidogrel compared to ASS for secondary prevention in German patients with MI, IS, or PAD.
- To evaluate the cost per life-year saved (LYS) from the perspective of German third-party payers (TPP).
Main Methods:
- An existing Markov model was adapted to the German healthcare setting using German cost data.
- The model incorporated cardiovascular event survival times from Framingham and Saskatchewan health databases in separate scenarios.
- Data from the CAPRIE trial formed the basis for the cost-effectiveness analysis.
Main Results:
- Clopidogrel treatment resulted in 13.19 fewer vascular events per 1000 patients, including 2.21 fewer vascular deaths.
- The incremental costs for 2-year management with clopidogrel were approximately €1,241,440 per 1000 patients.
- Incremental costs per life-year saved were €14,380 (Framingham data) and €18,790 (Saskatchewan data).
Conclusions:
- The cost-effectiveness of clopidogrel in Germany aligns with findings from Belgium, Italy, and France.
- Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios below €20,000 per LYS are likely acceptable to German third-party payers.
- Clopidogrel represents a potentially cost-effective secondary prevention strategy for atherothrombotic diseases in Germany.
Objectives:
To model the 2-year cost-effectiveness of secondary prevention with clopidogrel versus aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) (ASS) in German patients with myocardial infarction (MI), ischaemic stroke (IS) or diagnosed with peripheral arterial disease (PAD), based on CAPRIE trial data and from the perspective of German third party payers (TPP).
Methods:
An existing Markov model was adapted to Germany by using German cost data. The model was extended by using different datasets for cardiovascular event survival times (Framingham vs. Saskatchewan health databases) and in two separate scenarios.
Results:
The treatment with clopidogrel leads to a reduction of 13.19 vascular events per 1000 patients, of which 2.21 are vascular deaths. The overall incremental costs for the 2-year management of atherothrombotic patients with clopidogrel instead of ASS are calculated to be about euro1 241 440 per 1000 patients. The number of life-years saved (LYS) has been calculated as the difference in the number of life-years lost due to vascular death or events with ASS versus clopidogrel: it is 86.35 LYS when analysis is based on Framingham data and 66.07 LYS with Saskatchewan-based survival data. The incremental costs per LYS are euro14 380 and euro18 790, respectively. Cost-effectiveness is sensitive to changes in survival data, discounting and daily costs of clopidogrel, but stable against substantial (+/- 25%) changes in all other cost data.
Conclusion:
The findings for Germany are in line with published results for Belgium (euro13 390 per LYS) and also with results for Italy (euro17 500 per LYS), both based on Saskatchewan data, and with a French analysis based on Framingham data (euro15 907 per LYS). Even if no officially accepted cost-effectiveness threshold exists for Germany at present, incremental cost-effectiveness results of less than euro20 000 per LYS for the treatment with clopidogrel can be assumed to be acceptable for German third party payers.
Related Concept Videos
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Pharmacokinetics in Geriatric Patients: Effect of Age on Drug Metabolism
Pharmaceutical Equivalents
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence