Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Proposing a manuscript peer-review checklist.

Simon Duchesne1, Pierre Jannin

  • 1Département de Radiologie, Faculté de Médecine, et Centre de Recherche de l'Université Laval Robert Giffard, Université Laval, Québec, Canada. duchesne@ieee.org

Neuroimage
|December 7, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

EXPRESS: A scoping review of computational models on human glucose cerebral metabolism.

Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism·2026
Same author

Investigating Physical Exercise and Cognitive Training Effects on Cognition and Brain Health in Men and Women with Heart Failure: The ReCARDIO Trial.

CJC open·2026
Same author

Let us define arthroscopic surgeon's ergonomics! design of visualisation and evaluation approaches of surgical ergonomics.

International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery·2026
Same author

Objective structured assessment of posterior capsular rupture management.

Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie·2026
Same author

Perceived Crises and Preparedness Gaps in Operating Room Nursing: A Qualitative Study of Training Priorities With Nurses and Educators.

Journal of nursing management·2026
Same author

Please follow the rules: surgical workflow recognition constrained by linear temporal logic.

International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery·2026
Same journal

Lifespan Trajectories of the Brain's Functional Complexity Characterized by Multiscale Sample Entropy.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Pleasant fragrance modulates dyadic social sharing of positive emotion: Sharer-centered socioemotional enhancement effect and its neural couplings.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Altered Functional Hierarchical and Sequential Organization in Individuals with Schizophrenia during Auditory Processing.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Mechanical Deformation Explains Distinct Neuroimaging Patterns and Etiologies in Brain Trauma.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Ventral striatum temporal interference brain stimulation enhances the reward-positivity event-related potential and reduces anxiety.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

NeuroHarm‑Kit: An Open‑Source Toolbox for Benchmarking Deep‑Learning Harmonization of Multi‑Site T1‑Weighted MRI.

NeuroImage·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces a 71-criterion peer-review checklist to enhance reviewer productivity and maintain quality in academic publishing. The checklist aims to streamline the manuscript evaluation process for scientific journals.

Area of Science:

  • Scholarly communication
  • Academic publishing
  • Scientific peer review

Background:

  • Increasing manuscript volume and decreasing reviewer time challenge peer-review quality.
  • A need exists for enhanced reviewer productivity to maintain high standards.
  • Systematic tools are required to support reviewers in the modern academic landscape.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and present a comprehensive manuscript peer-review checklist.
  • To aid reviewers in conducting a more systematic and efficient evaluation process.
  • To facilitate improved quality and productivity in scientific peer review.

Main Methods:

  • Compiled and structured information from six reference standards and guidelines.
  • Incorporated directives from 21 peer-reviewed journals and conferences.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Developed a 71-criterion checklist based on verification, validation, and evaluation paradigms.

    • Main Results:

    • A 71-criterion manuscript peer-review checklist has been developed.
    • The checklist is presented with a description of an associated review workflow.
    • The tool is intended for wide dissemination and seeks feedback for validation.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed checklist offers a structured approach to manuscript peer review.
    • Implementation of the checklist may lead to significant productivity gains for reviewers.
    • Further validation and feedback are sought to refine the tool and quantify its impact on productivity.