Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2026

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
Published on: September 10, 2018
Discrete-trial vs. continuous free-operant procedures in assessing whether reinforcement context affects
Margaret A McDevitt1, Matthew C Bell
1Psychology Department, McDaniel College, 2 College Hill, Westminster, MD 21157, United States. mmcdevit@mcdaniel.edu
Pigeons showed a preference for higher reinforcement probabilities. However, continuous stimulus presentation during training led to a preference for a moderate schedule previously paired with leaner conditions, influencing choice behavior.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral psychology
- Animal cognition
- Reinforcement learning
Background:
- Concurrent reinforcement schedules are fundamental in understanding choice behavior.
- Pigeons (Columba livia) are widely used models for studying associative learning and decision-making.
- Understanding how training procedures influence preference is crucial for behavioral analysis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how different training procedures under concurrent reinforcement schedules affect pigeons' choice preferences.
- To examine the influence of stimulus duration and intertrial interval (ITI) presentation on preference.
- To determine if absolute reinforcement magnitude or relative context influences choice behavior.
Main Methods:
- Pigeons were trained on two alternating concurrent reinforcement schedules with varying probabilities (.05, .10, .20).
- Two training conditions were used: discrete-trial (stimuli on for 5s or until response) and continuous-stimulus (stimuli remained on).
- Probe tests were conducted after training to assess preference between alternatives.
Main Results:
- Overall, the .20 reinforcement probability was preferred over the .05 probability in both training conditions.
- Following discrete-trial training, no significant preference was found between the two .10 alternatives.
- After continuous-stimulus training, pigeons preferred the .10 alternative previously associated with the leaner schedule (.05).
Conclusions:
- Probe preference is influenced by both absolute reinforcement probabilities and the relative context established during training.
- Changeover behavior and stimulus presentation during ITIs can modulate choice preferences in concurrent schedules.
- The findings highlight the dynamic interplay between reinforcement history and stimulus conditions in shaping decision-making.
Related Concept Videos
Reinforcement Schedules
Once a behavior is learned,...
Operant Conditioning
Reinforcement in operant conditioning can be positive or negative, both of which serve to increase the likelihood of a behavior. Positive...
Generalization, Discrimination, and Extinction
Generalization occurs when a behavior reinforced in one context is performed in similar situations. For instance, a student who studies diligently for calculus and receives excellent grades might apply the same study habits to psychology and history, expecting similar results. Generalization shows how learning in one setting can influence behavior in...
Operant Conditioning Intervention
In operant conditioning, behaviors that are...
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...
Reinforcement
Positive reinforcement occurs when a behavior is followed by the presentation of a rewarding stimulus, increasing the frequency of that behavior. For example:

