Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Clinical Trials: Overview01:11

Clinical Trials: Overview

Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...
Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Preclinical Development: Overview01:28

Preclinical Development: Overview

Preclinical development consists of a series of tests that ensure the safety and efficacy of a new therapeutic compound before it is tested in humans. There are four main phases to this process. First, safety pharmacology tests are conducted to ensure the drug does not produce any acutely harmful effects. These tests examine parameters such as bronchoconstriction, cardiac dysrhythmias, blood pressure changes, and ataxia. Next, preliminary toxicological testing is performed to determine the...
Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ischaemic stroke and 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine: A systematic review and meta-analysis of harms and a retrospective study of the WHO pharmacovigilance database.

British journal of pharmacology·2026
Same author

Multi-omics data integration using time-to event endpoint and supervised Cox penalized regression: a comprehensive review.

Clinical and experimental medicine·2026
Same author

Efficacy of buparlisib according to PIK3CA mutation status in recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A multicenter phase II trial.

Oral oncology·2026
Same author

Health-related quality of life in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer receiving maintenance olaparib plus bevacizumab (PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25).

Journal of the National Cancer Institute·2026
Same author

Phase 1b study of ABBV-368, tilsotolimod, budigalimab, and nab-paclitaxel in patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Journal for immunotherapy of cancer·2026
Same author

CMV seropositivity associates with poor clinical outcome in triple negative breast cancer.

iScience·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 9, 2026

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cancer Drug Sensitization In Vitro and In Vivo
09:19

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cancer Drug Sensitization In Vitro and In Vivo

Published on: February 6, 2015

[Phase I cancer trials methodology].

Christophe Le Tourneau1, Sandrine Faivre, Eric Raymond

  • 1Service inter-hospitalier de cancérologie, Hôpital Beaujon, 100, boulevard du général Leclerc, 92110 Clichy. hc.le_tourneau@cegetel.net

Bulletin Du Cancer
|December 7, 2007
PubMed
Summary

Phase I cancer trials determine optimal drug doses for efficacy and safety. Novel statistical methods improve upon historical approaches like Fibonacci escalation for better patient outcomes.

More Related Videos

Therapy Testing in a Spheroid-based 3D Cell Culture Model for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
06:11

Therapy Testing in a Spheroid-based 3D Cell Culture Model for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Published on: April 20, 2018

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
06:20

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition

Published on: March 11, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 9, 2026

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cancer Drug Sensitization In Vitro and In Vivo
09:19

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cancer Drug Sensitization In Vitro and In Vivo

Published on: February 6, 2015

Therapy Testing in a Spheroid-based 3D Cell Culture Model for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
06:11

Therapy Testing in a Spheroid-based 3D Cell Culture Model for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Published on: April 20, 2018

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
06:20

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition

Published on: March 11, 2021

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Clinical Pharmacology
  • Biostatistics

Context:

  • Phase I cancer trials are crucial for establishing safe and effective drug doses.
  • Traditional methods like Fibonacci escalation have limitations in trial length and patient exposure.
  • Balancing efficacy with acceptable toxicity is a primary challenge in early-phase cancer drug development.

Purpose:

  • To identify the recommended dose for anticancer agents in single or combination therapies.
  • To minimize patient exposure to sub-efficacious or toxic doses.
  • To inform subsequent Phase II and III clinical development.

Summary:

  • Phase I trials aim to find the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or optimal biological dose (OBD).
  • Novel statistical designs, including pharmacologically guided escalation and continual reassessment methods, offer improvements over older methods.
  • For targeted therapies, toxicity alone may be insufficient; target inhibition and pharmacokinetics are key.

Impact:

  • Optimizing dose selection enhances the risk/benefit ratio for cancer patients.
  • Improved trial designs can accelerate drug development and reduce costs.
  • Advances in dose-finding methodologies are critical for bringing novel cancer therapies to patients.