Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2026
A Test Bed to Examine Helmet Fit and Retention and Biomechanical Measures of Head and Neck Injury in Simulated Impact
Published on: September 21, 2017
Car safety seats for children: rear facing for best protection
B Henary1, C P Sherwood, J R Crandall
1Center for Applied Biomechanics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22902, USA.
Insights
Rear-facing car seats (RFCS) offer superior protection for children under 2 years old compared to forward-facing car seats (FFCS). Studies show RFCS significantly reduce the risk of serious injury in various crash types, especially side impacts.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric injury prevention
- Traffic safety research
- Child passenger safety
Background:
- Child car seat usage is critical for preventing injuries in vehicle accidents.
- Rear-facing car seats (RFCS) and forward-facing car seats (FFCS) are common restraint systems.
- Understanding the comparative injury risk associated with RFCS and FFCS for young children is essential.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the injury risk between rear-facing car seats (RFCS) and forward-facing car seats (FFCS) for children under 2 years of age in the USA.
Main Methods:
- Data were extracted from a US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration crash database (1988-2003).
- Children aged 0-23 months restrained in RFCS or FFCS were analyzed.
- Logistic regression and restraint effectiveness calculations were employed.
Main Results:
- Children in FFCS were significantly more likely to be seriously injured than those in RFCS across all crash types (OR=1.76).
- In side crashes, FFCS posed a substantially higher risk (OR=5.53).
- RFCS demonstrated higher effectiveness (93%) compared to FFCS (78%).
Conclusions:
- Rear-facing car seats (RFCS) are more effective than forward-facing car seats (FFCS) for children aged 0-23 months.
- RFCS provide optimum protection for children up to their second birthday when used correctly.
- The study strongly recommends RFCS for young children based on reduced injury risk.
Objective:
To compare the injury risk between rear-facing (RFCS) and forward-facing (FFCS) car seats for children less than 2 years of age in the USA.
Methods:
Data were extracted from a US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration vehicle crash database for the years 1988-2003. Children 0-23 months of age restrained in an RFCS or FFCS when riding in passenger cars, sport utility vehicles, or light trucks were included in the study. Logistic regression models and restraint effectiveness calculations were used to compare the risk of injury between children restrained in RFCSs and FFCSs.
Results:
Children in FFCSs were significantly more likely to be seriously injured than children restrained in RFCSs in all crash types (OR=1.76, 95% CI 1.40 to 2.20). When considering frontal crashes alone, children in FFCSs were more likely to be seriously injured (OR=1.23), although this finding was not statistically significant (95% CI 0.95 to 1.59). In side crashes, however, children in FFCSs were much more likely to be injured (OR=5.53, 95% CI 3.74 to 8.18). When 1 year olds were analyzed separately, these children were also more likely to be seriously injured when restrained in FFCSs (OR=5.32, 95% CI 3.43 to 8.24). Effectiveness estimates for RFCSs (93%) were found to be 15% higher than those for FFCSs (78%).
Conclusions:
RFCSs are more effective than FFCSs in protecting restrained children aged 0-23 months. The same findings apply when 1 year olds are analyzed separately. Use of an RFCS, in accordance with restraint recommendations for child size and weight, is an excellent choice for optimum protection up to a child's second birthday.
Related Concept Videos
01:28Survey Safety
01:29Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
01:20Personal Protective Equipment
01:29Sight Distance in a Vertical Curve
01:14Piaget's Stage 1 of Cognitive Development
Exploration...