Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Response method in audiometry.

Jeffrey J DiGiovanni1, Jennifer N Repka

  • 1W222 Grover Center, School of Hearing, Speech, and Language Sciences, Ohio University, Athens, OH 45701, USA. digiovan@ohio.edu

American Journal of Audiology
|December 7, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pspan: A New Tool for Assessing Pitch Temporal Processing and Patterning Capacity.

American journal of audiology·2019
Same author

Exploration of Head Related Transfer Function and Environmental Sounds as a Means to Improve Auditory Scanning for Children Requiring Augmentative and Alternative Communication.

Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA·2019
Same author

Dominance of persistence over adaptation in forward masking.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2018
Same author

The Interprofessional Education Environment: Places and Pedagogies.

Seminars in speech and language·2017
Same author

High- and Low-Frequency Decrement Contribution to Spectral Enhancement.

American journal of audiology·2015
Same author

Effects of transient noise reduction algorithms on speech intelligibility and ratings of hearing aid users.

American journal of audiology·2011
Same journal

Cochlear Implant Mentorship Program for Audiologists to Improve Veteran Outcomes.

American journal of audiology·2026
Same journal

Cochlear Implantation in Children Without a Hearing Aid Trial: A Case Series of 22 Patients.

American journal of audiology·2026
Same journal

Associations Between Self-Reported Workload and Measures of Speech Recognition in Adults Across the Lifespan.

American journal of audiology·2026
Same journal

Emotion-Specific Associations Between Perceived Sound Quality and Auditory Emotion Recognition in Children With Cochlear Implants.

American journal of audiology·2026
Same journal

Development and Validation of Modified Basic English Lexicon Sentences for Use With a Pediatric Population.

American journal of audiology·2026
Same journal

Risk of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss: A Survey of Texas Shop Teachers.

American journal of audiology·2026
See all related articles

For measuring auditory thresholds in young adults, using a response button is faster and preferred over hand-raising or verbal responses. This method did not affect accuracy or false alarms.

Area of Science:

  • Audiology
  • Hearing Science

Background:

  • Accurate measurement of pure-tone thresholds is crucial for diagnosing hearing loss.
  • Different response methods exist, but their efficiency and participant acceptance vary.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the speed, false-alarm rate, and participant preference of three response methods: hand-raising, push-button, and oral response.
  • To determine the optimal response method for pure-tone threshold measurement in individuals with normal hearing.

Main Methods:

  • Thirty female university students with normal hearing participated in the study.
  • Pure-tone air-conduction thresholds were measured using each of the three response methods.
  • Threshold measurements were repeated within two weeks to ensure reliability.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The push-button response method was significantly faster, reducing test time by approximately one minute compared to hand-raising or oral responses.
  • Participants showed a significant preference for the push-button response method.
  • No significant differences were observed in threshold levels or false-alarm rates across the response methods.

Conclusions:

  • The push-button response method is recommended for measuring auditory thresholds in young adults with normal hearing due to its efficiency and participant preference.
  • This finding supports optimizing audiological testing procedures for better patient experience and potentially increased throughput.