Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2026

Quadruple-Checkerboard: A Modification of the Three-Dimensional Checkerboard for Studying Drug Combinations
Published on: July 24, 2021
Cefpodoxime proxetil compared with cefixime for treatment of typhoid fever in children
Md Salim Shakur1, Selina Akhter Laila Arzuman, Jesmin Hossain
1Dhaka Shishu (Children) Hospital, ShereBangla Nagar, Dhaka 1207, Bangladesh. njshantu@yahoo.com
Insights
Cefpodoxime Proxetil (CP) is an effective and safe oral treatment for pediatric typhoid fever, offering similar clinical outcomes to cefixime (CF) but at a lower cost. This study highlights CP as a cost-effective alternative for managing this common childhood infection.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Infectious Diseases
- Clinical Pharmacology
- Antimicrobial Therapy
Background:
- Typhoid fever remains a significant public health concern, particularly in children.
- Effective oral antibiotic options are crucial for managing typhoid fever, impacting treatment accessibility and cost.
- Cefpodoxime Proxetil (CP) and cefixime (CF) are third-generation cephalosporins used for bacterial infections.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the clinical and bacteriological efficacy of oral Cefpodoxime Proxetil (CP) versus oral cefixime (CF) in children with culture-confirmed typhoid fever.
- To evaluate safety, relapse rates, and cost-effectiveness of CP compared to CF.
- To provide evidence for CP as a potential alternative treatment for pediatric typhoid fever.
Main Methods:
- A randomized, double-blind clinical trial involving 40 children with culture-confirmed typhoid fever.
- Participants were assigned to receive either oral CP (16 mg/kg/day) or oral CF (20 mg/kg/day) for 10 days.
- Clinical and bacteriological outcomes, including time to defervescence, clinical failures, eradication rates, and adverse effects, were assessed.
Main Results:
- Both CP and CF demonstrated similar clinical efficacy, with low rates of clinical failure (1 in each group).
- Bacteriological eradication was achieved in all participants following treatment with either antibiotic.
- The time to defervescence was comparable between the CP and CF groups (4.87 +/- 2.33 vs 4.27 +/- 2.28 days, P = 0.308).
- No significant adverse effects or relapses were observed during the 3-month follow-up period.
- CP treatment resulted in a 33% reduction in treatment cost compared to CF.
Conclusions:
- Cefpodoxime Proxetil (CP) is a clinically effective and safe oral option for treating typhoid fever in children.
- CP offers comparable efficacy to cefixime (CF) with the added benefit of being more cost-effective.
- CP represents a valuable and economical therapeutic choice for pediatric typhoid fever management.
Abstract:
In order to evaluate clinical and bacteriological efficacy of Cefpodoxime Proxetil (CP) in typhoid fever in comparison to cefixime (CF), we assessed 140 children with suspected typhoid fever. Fulfilling inclusion criteria finally 40 culture confirmed typhoid fever were allocated in randomized double blind clinical trial (RCT) to receive therapy with either oral CP (16 mg/kg/day, n = 21) or oral CF (20 mg/kg/day, n = 19) for 10 days. The two groups were comparable in their clinical and baseline characteristics. The clinical efficacy was similar in the two groups with only 2 (one in each group) clinical failures and all showing bacteriological eradication on subsequent blood culture. The time of defervescence was comparable in both groups (4.87 Fluconazole Prophylaxis against Fungal Colonization and Invasive Fungal Infection in Very Low Birth Weight Infants 2.33 vs 4.27 +/- 2.28 days, P = 0.308), with no relapse during 3 months follow up and no significant adverse effect. CP reduced the treatment cost by 33% in comparison to cefixime. Our study suggests CP is effective, safe and cheaper oral option for treatment of typhoid fever in children.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Inhibitors of Bacterial DNA Synthesis
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption