Defining the role of NMP22 in bladder cancer surveillance

Despite advances in treatment and knowledge of its pathogenesis, urothelial carcinoma of the bladder remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Experience with the natural course of bladder cancer has revealed that early diagnosis of primary and recurrent disease improves patient prognosis. In this regard, cystoscopy (usually in combination with urinary cytology) has long been regarded as the gold standard for the diagnosis and surveillance of bladder cancer. However, the disadvantages inherent to cystoscopy, including invasiveness and cost, have stimulated a search for alternative methods for detecting urothelial malignancy. The ideal alternative test would duplicate the high accuracy of cystoscopy for detecting bladder tumors while eschewing its invasiveness, attendant morbidity, and high cost. The vast majority of bladder cancers arise from the urothelium, which continually sheds cells as well as intracellular contents into the urine, thereby providing a potential source of cancer-specific markers. Voided cytology and urinalysis are established tests that have been the standard tools for detection of such substances. The last decade has seen the rise of a myriad of novel urine-based bladder tumor markers, including bladder tumor antigen, urinary bladder cancer antigen, fibronectin, telomerase, and nuclear matrix proteins (e.g., NMP22). The NMP22 assay in particular has been the subject of considerable study and has demonstrated some promise as a potential adjunct to cystoscopy and cytology. Through a critical review of the literature, we seek to define the role, if any, of NMP22 in the follow-up of patients with a previous history of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.