Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2026

Cardiac Pressure-Volume Loop Analysis Using Conductance Catheters in Mice
Published on: September 17, 2015
Losartan versus atenolol on 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure. A LIFE substudy
Lia E Bang1, Niels Wiinberg, Kristian Wachtell
1Naestved Hospital, Naestved, Denmark.
Insights
Losartan and atenolol equally reduced 24-hour blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) in hypertensive patients. This study found no significant differences in BP or HR to explain losartan
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Hypertension Research
- Pharmacology
Background:
- The Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension (LIFE) study previously demonstrated losartan's superiority over atenolol in reducing cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy.
- Both treatment strategies achieved similar reductions in office blood pressure (BP).
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the comparative effects of losartan-based versus atenolol-based treatment on 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) in the LIFE study.
- To explore potential mechanisms for the observed outcome differences between the two antihypertensive drug classes.
Main Methods:
- A subset of 110 patients from the LIFE study underwent 24-hour ambulatory BP and HR monitoring.
- Measurements were taken at baseline and after 1 year of treatment with either losartan or atenolol.
Main Results:
- Both losartan and atenolol comparably reduced 24-hour ambulatory BP throughout the entire day-night cycle after one year.
- While both treatments lowered office and ambulatory BP similarly, the 'non-dipping' phenomenon (lack of nocturnal BP fall) was more prevalent in the losartan group.
- The 24-hour HR profile remained unchanged with losartan, whereas atenolol significantly decreased daytime HR, with a less pronounced effect during early night-time.
Conclusions:
- The comparable 24-hour BP and HR profiles observed between losartan- and atenolol-based treatments do not fully explain the superior cardiovascular outcomes associated with losartan in the LIFE study.
- Further research is needed to elucidate the mechanisms behind losartan's improved clinical efficacy in this patient population.
Objective:
The Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension (LIFE) study showed that losartan-based treatment reduced risk of the composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, stroke and myocardial infarction compared with atenolol-based treatment in patients with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy with similar office blood pressure (BP) reduction. Our aim was to investigate the effect of losartan- and atenolol-based treatment on 24-h ambulatory BP and heart rate (HR) in LIFE.
Methods:
In 110 patients, 24-h ambulatory BP and heart rate were recorded at baseline and 1 year after randomization.
Results:
Ambulatory BP was comparably reduced throughout the 24-h period after 1 year of losartan- vs atenolol-based antihypertensive treatment. Office and ambulatory BP were comparably reduced in the follow-up period. Early morning surge in BP was similar between groups. Non-dipping status was more frequent in the losartan group (p = 0.01). From baseline to Year 1 the 24-h HR profile for the losartan group was unchanged, but, as expected, there was a significant decrease in daytime HR in the atenolol group, which was not as large during early night-time.
Conclusion:
There were no differences in 24-h BP burden and HR that could explain the difference in outcome in favor of losartan vs atenolol in the LIFE study.
Related Concept Videos
Antihypertensive Drugs: Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers
Hypertension IV: Drug Therapy and Lifestyle Modifications
Antihypertensive Drugs: Direct Renin Inhibitors
Antihypertensive Drugs: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies