Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2026

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Mortality in patients with heart failure treated with cardiac resynchronisation therapy. A long-term multi-centre
Maciej Sterliński1, Aleksander Maciag, Oskar Kowalski
12nd Department of Coronary Heart Disease, National Institute of Cardiology, Poland. msterlinski@poczta.onet.pl
Insights
Sudden cardiac death risk is highest in the first year for cardiac resynchronisation therapy pacing-only (CRT-P) patients. Heart failure deaths increase later, suggesting prophylactic defibrillation for eligible CRT patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Heart Failure Management
Background:
- Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) improves survival in selected congestive heart failure (CHF) patients per 2005 ESC guidelines.
- CRT pacing-only (CRT-P) is an established treatment for specific heart failure populations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze mortality rates and causes of death in patients receiving CRT-P.
- To evaluate the temporal pattern of mortality in CRT-P recipients over at least one year.
Main Methods:
- Prospective, multi-site observational study.
- Followed 105 patients (19 female, 86 male) aged 60.6±9.8 years with advanced CHF (NYHA class 3.2±0.4).
- Investigated mortality and mode of death in patients with coronary artery disease (54%) and non-coronary heart failure (46%).
Main Results:
- 21% of patients died within the follow-up period (mean 730 days).
- Sudden cardiac deaths (SCD) constituted 24% of all deaths, predominantly within the first year.
- Heart failure deaths (HFD) accounted for 62% of mortality, with risk increasing after the first year.
Conclusions:
- The highest risk of sudden cardiac death in CRT-P patients occurs within the first year post-implantation.
- The risk of death from heart failure increases beyond the first year.
- Prophylactic defibrillation should be considered for all patients eligible for CRT.
Background:
Benefits of cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) for survival in selected congestive heart failure (CHF) patients have been acknowledged by the 2005 ESC guidelines.
Aim:
To analyse mortality in CRT pacing only (CRT-P) patients during at least one-year follow-up.
Methods:
This was a prospective, multi-site, at least one-year observational study on mortality and mode of death in patients who received CRT-P due to commonly accepted indications. One-year follow-up data (or earlier death) were available for 105 patients (19 females, 86 males) aged 60.6+/-9.8 years (35-78). Baseline NYHA class was 3.2+/-0.4 (3-4). Coronary artery disease (CAD) was the underlying aetiology of CHF in 57 (54%) patients and 48 (46%) patients had CHF due to non-coronary factors.
Results:
Mean follow-up duration was 730 days (360-1780), median 625. There were 21 (20%) deaths: 5 (24%) sudden cardiac deaths (SCD), 13 (62%) deaths due to heart failure (HFD) and 3 (14%) other deaths. Thirteen (62%) patients died within the first year of observation. All SCD occurred in this period. Mean time to death was 303+/-277 days (19-960) to HFD - 339+/-313 days (19-960) and to SCD - 208+/-127 days (31-343). There were no significant differences between survivors and non-survivors with respect to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (25+/-10 vs. 20+/-8%), 6-minute walk test (6 min WT) (276+/-166 vs. 285+/-163 m) and LV diastolic diameter (LVEDD) (71+/-9 vs. 78+/-10 mm) (all NS). The SCD and HFD patients had similar age (62.0+/-5.4 vs. 56.6+/-13.2 years), gender (80 vs. 83% males), NYHA class (3.1+/-0.2 vs. 3.5+/-0.3), LVEF (22+/-9 vs. 17+/-5%), LVEDD (86+/-10 vs. 79+/-9 mm), 6 min WT (270+/-142 vs. 292+/-188 m) (NS). In 4 patients from the SCD group CHF was of non-coronary aetiology and only in 1 patient from the HFD group (p=0.003). The values of LVEF, LVEDD and NYHA class in HFD patients who died during the first year after implantation, compared with those who died later, were similar.
Conclusions:
Sudden cardiac death probability in the studied CRT-P population was the highest during the first year after implantation. Afterwards, the risk of HFD started to increase. Thus, in all patients eligible for CRT prophylactic defibrillation function should be considered.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Rheumatic Heart Disease III: Medical Management
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
