Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2026

Assays for Validating Histone Acetyltransferase Inhibitors
Published on: August 6, 2020
Competitive inhibition of histone deacetylase activity by trichostatin A and butyrate
Anoushe Sekhavat1, Jian-Min Sun, James R Davie
1MB Institute of Cell Biology, University of Manitoba, 675 McDermot Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Abstract:
Histone deacetylases (HDACs) play a pivotal role in gene expression through their involvement in chromatin remodeling. The abnormal targeting or retention of HDACs to DNA regulatory regions is observed in many cancers, and hence HDAC inhibitors are being tested as promising anti-tumor agents. The results of previous kinetic studies, characterizing trichostatin A (TSA), as well as butyrate, as HDAC noncompetitive inhibitors, conflict with crystallographic and homology modeling data suggesting that TSA should act as a competitive inhibitor. Our results demonstrate that each of the HDAC inhibitors TSA and butyrate inhibits HDAC activity in a competitive fashion. Co-immunoprecipitation studies show that the inhibition of HDAC1 and HDAC2 activity by TSA does not disturb the extensive level of their association in the human breast cancer cell line MCF-7. Moreover, the inhibition of HDAC activity by TSA does not interfere with the interaction of HDAC1 and HDAC2 with Sin3A, a core component of the Sin3 complex. Thus, repressor complexes such as Sin3, appear to be stable in the presence of TSA. The association of HDAC2 with transcription factor Sp1 is also not affected by TSA.
Insights
Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors trichostatin A (TSA) and butyrate competitively inhibit HDAC activity. TSA treatment does not disrupt HDAC1/HDAC2 interactions with Sin3A or Sp1 in breast cancer cells.
Area of Science:
- Molecular Biology
- Epigenetics
- Cancer Research
Background:
- Histone deacetylases (HDACs) are crucial for gene expression and chromatin remodeling.
- Aberrant HDAC activity is implicated in various cancers, making HDAC inhibitors potential anti-tumor agents.
- Conflicting data exists regarding the inhibition mechanism of HDAC inhibitors like trichostatin A (TSA).
Purpose of the Study:
- To clarify the inhibitory mechanism of HDAC inhibitors TSA and butyrate.
- To investigate the effect of TSA on protein-protein interactions involving HDAC1 and HDAC2.
Main Methods:
- Enzyme kinetics assays to determine inhibition type.
- Co-immunoprecipitation to assess protein complex stability.
Main Results:
- TSA and butyrate were confirmed to be competitive inhibitors of HDAC activity.
- TSA did not affect the association of HDAC1 and HDAC2 with Sin3A in MCF-7 cells.
- TSA also did not interfere with the interaction between HDAC2 and transcription factor Sp1.
Conclusions:
- The study resolves conflicting data, establishing TSA and butyrate as competitive HDAC inhibitors.
- HDAC inhibitor TSA maintains the stability of repressor complexes like Sin3 and does not disrupt interactions with transcription factors.
- These findings support the therapeutic potential of TSA in cancer treatment by clarifying its mechanism of action.
Related Concept Videos
Histone Modification
Acetylation
The enzyme histone acetyltransferase adds acetyl group to the histones. Another enzyme, histone deacetylase,...
Histone Modification
Acetylation
The enzyme histone acetyltransferase adds acetyl group to the histones. Another enzyme, histone deacetylase,...
Eukaryotic Transcription Inhibitors
Eukaryotic transcription inhibitors usually contain two distinct domains, a DNA...
Spreading of Chromatin Modifications
Writers
The writer is an enzyme that can...
Co-activators and Co-repressors
Allosteric Proteins-ATCase
Aspartate transcarbamoylase (ATCase) is a cytosolic enzyme that catalyzes the condensation of L-aspartate and carbamoyl phosphate to N-carbamoyl-L-aspartate. This reaction is the first step in pyrimidine biosynthesis. UTP and CTP, the end products of the pyrimidine synthesis pathway,...

