Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals

¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals

Spin systems where the difference in chemical shifts of the coupled nuclei is greater than ten times J are called first-order spin systems. These nuclei are weakly coupled, and their chemical shifts and coupling constant can generally be estimated from the well-separated signals in the spectrum.
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are slanted or...

Aliasing

Aliasing

Accurate signal sampling and reconstruction are crucial in various signal-processing applications. A time-domain signal's spectrum can be revealed using its Fourier transform. When this signal is sampled at a specific frequency, it results in multiple scaled replicas of the original spectrum in the frequency domain. The spacing of these replicas is determined by the sampling frequency.
If the sampling frequency is below the Nyquist rate, these replicas overlap, preventing the original signal...

Bandpass Sampling

Bandpass Sampling

In signal processing, bandpass sampling is an effective technique for sampling signals that have most of their energy concentrated within a narrow frequency band. This type of signal is known as a bandpass signal. The key principle of bandpass sampling involves sampling the signal at a rate that is greater than twice the signal's bandwidth to prevent aliasing.
A bandpass signal has a spectrum with a lower frequency limit, denoted as ω1, and an upper frequency limit, denoted as ω2. The spectrum...

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...

¹³C NMR: ¹H–¹³C Decoupling

¹³C NMR: ¹H–¹³C Decoupling

The probability of having two carbon-13 atoms next to each other is negligible because of the low natural abundance of carbon-13. Consequently, peak splitting due to carbon-carbon spin-spin coupling is not observed in spectra. However, protons up to three sigma bonds away split the carbon signal according to the n+1 rule, resulting in complicated spectra.
A broadband decoupling technique is used to simplify these complex, sometimes overlapping, signals. Broadband decoupling relies on a...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Rescaling invariance and anomalous energy transport in a small vertical column of grains.

Physical review. E·2023

Same author

Revealing the Nonequilibrium Nature of a Granular Intruder: The Crucial Role of Non-Gaussian Behavior.

Physical review letters·2023

Same author

Thermodynamic bounds for diffusion in nonequilibrium systems with multiple timescales.

Physical review. E·2023

Same author

Collective Drifts in Vibrated Granular Packings: The Interplay of Friction and Structure.

Physical review letters·2022

Same author

Vicsek model by time-interlaced compression: A dynamical computable information density.

Physical review. E·2021

Same author

Engineered swift equilibration of a Brownian gyrator.

Physical review. E·2020

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 9, 2026

New Framework for Understanding Cross-Brain Coherence in Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) Hyperscanning Studies

New Framework for Understanding Cross-Brain Coherence in Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) Hyperscanning Studies

Published on: October 6, 2023

Signal spatial filtering for co-phasing in seeing-limited conditions.

E Pinna¹, F Quirós-Pacheco, S Esposito

¹Observatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri, Largo E. Fermi 5, Firenze, Italy. pinna@arcetri.astro.it

|December 7, 2007

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

We demonstrate improved co-phasing loop performance for wavefront sensing using spatial filters. This significantly reduces time to average atmospheric disturbance, enhancing loop stability and accuracy.

More Related Videos

Shaping the Amplitude and Phase of Laser Beams by Using a Phase-only Spatial Light Modulator

Shaping the Amplitude and Phase of Laser Beams by Using a Phase-only Spatial Light Modulator

Published on: January 28, 2019

Transmission of Multiple Signals through an Optical Fiber Using Wavefront Shaping

Transmission of Multiple Signals through an Optical Fiber Using Wavefront Shaping

Published on: March 20, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 9, 2026

New Framework for Understanding Cross-Brain Coherence in Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) Hyperscanning Studies

New Framework for Understanding Cross-Brain Coherence in Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) Hyperscanning Studies

Published on: October 6, 2023

Shaping the Amplitude and Phase of Laser Beams by Using a Phase-only Spatial Light Modulator

Shaping the Amplitude and Phase of Laser Beams by Using a Phase-only Spatial Light Modulator

Published on: January 28, 2019

Transmission of Multiple Signals through an Optical Fiber Using Wavefront Shaping

Transmission of Multiple Signals through an Optical Fiber Using Wavefront Shaping

Published on: March 20, 2017

Area of Science:

Adaptive optics
Wavefront sensing

Background:

Co-phasing is crucial for optical system alignment.
Atmospheric disturbance degrades wavefront sensor performance.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the efficacy of spatial filters in a co-phasing closed loop.
To improve co-phasing loop performance under emulated atmospheric disturbance.

Main Methods:

Utilized a pyramid wavefront sensor for co-phasing.
Implemented two spatial filters: zonal and modal.
Applied filters to interaction matrix and sensor signals.

Main Results:

Achieved significant improvement in co-phasing loop performance.
Reduced time to average atmospheric disturbance by 2 orders of magnitude.
Enhanced overall loop stability and accuracy.

Conclusions:

Spatial filtering is effective for improving co-phasing in wavefront sensing.
The combined zonal and modal filtering approach enhances performance under disturbance.
This method offers a robust solution for real-time optical system correction.