Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2026

Prehospital Thrombolysis: A Manual from Berlin
Published on: November 27, 2013
Strategies for pre-hospital thrombolysis: an overview
1Thoraxcenter, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Insights
Pre-hospital thrombolysis significantly reduces treatment delays for myocardial infarction patients. Various strategies, including ECG analysis and direct administration, achieve treatment within approximately 100 minutes, improving survival outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Emergency Medicine
Background:
- Thrombolytic therapy is crucial for improving survival in myocardial infarction (MI).
- Reducing the delay between coronary occlusion and reperfusion is key to effective treatment.
- Pre-hospital interventions can significantly decrease this critical time window.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate different pre-hospital thrombolysis strategies for acute myocardial infarction.
- To assess the time gained and feasibility of early treatment initiation outside the hospital.
- To determine the impact of various diagnostic methods on treatment delay.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review and pooled analysis of 14 studies on pre-hospital thrombolysis.
- Comparison of strategies including physician-interpreted ECG, remote ECG analysis, computer-assisted ECG, and no ECG criteria.
- Data collection on time from symptom onset to treatment and time gain compared to hospital admission.
Main Results:
- Physician-interpreted ECG: treatment within 103 min, time gain of 51 min.
- ECG transmission: treatment within 93 min, time gains of 62-86 min.
- Computer analysis: treatment within 102 min, time gain of 48 min.
- No ECG criteria: treatment within 83 min, time gain of 45 min (diagnostic accuracy 42%).
Conclusions:
- All evaluated pre-hospital thrombolysis strategies enable treatment within approximately 100 minutes of symptom onset.
- Significant time gains (≥45 min) are achievable, potentially improving patient survival.
- The choice of strategy impacts diagnostic accuracy and implementation but all offer substantial time advantages.
Abstract:
Improvement in survival as a result of thrombolytic therapy in patients with myocardial infarction is determined by the delay between coronary occlusion and reperfusion. Treatment at home can reduce this delay, provided that appropriate patients can be identified. Different strategies for pre-hospital thrombolysis have been developed. Most studies require ECG confirmation of evolving myocardial infarction. In many, the ECG is interpreted by a physician in the ambulance. Others transmit the ECG to a remote physician or use computer analysis of an ECG made 'on the spot', A few studies use no ECG criteria at all. The pooled data show that with physician interpretation, 723 patients in 14 studies could be treated within 103 min after onset of symptoms (range 60-138 min) with a time gain of 51 min (range 30-74 min), compared with thrombolytic treatment after hospital admission. The therapeutic delay was 93 +/- 45 min (SD) with time gains of 62 and 86 min in two studies with ECG transmission (61 patients). In another study using computer analysis, ambulance nurses were able to treat 300 patients within 102 +/- 63 min after onset of symptoms, resulting in a time gain of 48 +/- 2 min. Without ECG confirmation, cardiologists accompanying the ambulance could administer thrombolysis within 83 +/- 4 min after onset of symptoms with a time gain of 45 min in one study. The diagnostic accuracy of this last approach was 42%. With each of the four approaches, patients can be treated within approximately 100 min after onset of symptoms, resulting in a time gain of 45 min or more.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Related Concept Videos
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Pharmaceutical Poisoning: Treatment Strategies
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Pulmonary Embolism III: Nursing Management

