Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Newborn screening reduces survival disparities in SCID after stem cell transplant: A PIDTC report.

Journal of human immunity·2026
Same author

Donor-Specific Transplant Outcomes from BMTCTN 1702: A Multi-Center Prospective Biological-Assignment Trial.

Blood advances·2026
Same author

TITE-safety: a robust time-to-event safety monitoring approach for clinical trials.

Biometrics·2026
Same author

Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Access and Patient Diversity.

JAMA network open·2026
Same author

A mathematically accurate angular regression model optimizes phase activation and yields additional physiological information in FMRI.

Magnetic resonance imaging·2026
Same author

A Bayesian approach to 2D acceleration for studying activation detection rate for simultaneously encoded slice acquisition in FMRI.

Magnetic resonance imaging·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 9, 2026

High-resolution Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Methods for Human Midbrain
10:06

High-resolution Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Methods for Human Midbrain

Published on: May 10, 2012

An evaluation of spatial thresholding techniques in fMRI analysis.

Brent R Logan1, Maya P Geliazkova, Daniel B Rowe

  • 1Division of Biostatistics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226, USA.

Human Brain Mapping
|December 8, 2007
PubMed
Summary

Spatial thresholding methods in fMRI analysis were evaluated for detecting brain activation. Smoothing enhances sensitivity but overestimates activation size, while mixture models offer better size estimation but may miss subtle signals.

More Related Videos

Topographical Estimation of Visual Population Receptive Fields by fMRI
06:02

Topographical Estimation of Visual Population Receptive Fields by fMRI

Published on: February 3, 2015

Diffusion Tensor Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Analysis of Neurodegenerative Diseases
09:33

Diffusion Tensor Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Analysis of Neurodegenerative Diseases

Published on: July 28, 2013

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 9, 2026

High-resolution Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Methods for Human Midbrain
10:06

High-resolution Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Methods for Human Midbrain

Published on: May 10, 2012

Topographical Estimation of Visual Population Receptive Fields by fMRI
06:02

Topographical Estimation of Visual Population Receptive Fields by fMRI

Published on: February 3, 2015

Diffusion Tensor Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Analysis of Neurodegenerative Diseases
09:33

Diffusion Tensor Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Analysis of Neurodegenerative Diseases

Published on: July 28, 2013

Area of Science:

  • Neuroimaging
  • Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI)
  • Statistical Analysis in Neuroscience

Background:

  • Identifying active voxels is crucial in fMRI experiments.
  • Voxel activation maps are constructed using statistical tests and thresholding.
  • Task-related activation often appears in clusters, necessitating spatial analysis techniques.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate spatial thresholding techniques for single-subject fMRI analysis.
  • To assess the sensitivity and accuracy of different methods in detecting and estimating activation regions.
  • To compare smoothing, cluster size inference, and spatial mixture modeling.

Main Methods:

  • Simulations were used to study two key aspects: sensitivity and accuracy of spatial thresholding.
  • Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were employed to assess detection sensitivity.
  • Bias and variance were analyzed to evaluate the accuracy of activation region size estimation.

Main Results:

  • Smoothing demonstrated the highest sensitivity for detecting modest signals but tended to overestimate activation region size.
  • Spatial mixture models provided accurate estimation of activation region size.
  • Spatial mixture models showed lower sensitivity to modest magnitude signals compared to smoothing.

Conclusions:

  • The choice of spatial thresholding method impacts sensitivity and accuracy in fMRI analysis.
  • Further research is needed to develop more sensitive spatial mixture models.
  • Findings were illustrated using a real fMRI experiment involving bilateral finger-tapping.