Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2026

Ultrasound Assessment of Endothelial-Dependent Flow-Mediated Vasodilation of the Brachial Artery in Clinical Research
Published on: October 22, 2014
Definition of normality of pressure-flow parameters based on observations in asymptomatic men
Derek J Rosario1, Henry H Woo, Christopher R Chapple
1Academic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. d.j.rosario@shef.ac.uk
Aims:
Clinical nomograms for differentiating obstructed from unobstructed voiding and poor detrusor contractility from normal contractility have traditionally been drawn on the basis of symptomatic response to outflow tract surgery or on urodynamic changes in men with LUTS before and after surgery. The aim of this study was to examine pressure-flow parameters in asymptomatic male volunteers before age-related changes in the lower urinary tract had taken place and to assess detrusor contractility and outflow conditions during physiological bladder filling against clinically used pressure-flow nomograms.
Methods:
Thirty-seven healthy male subjects between the ages of 18 and 40 years volunteered to undergo AUM. A total of 66 fill-void cycles in 25 individuals were evaluable.
Results:
Mean p(det.Qmax) for the group was 53 +/- 3 cmH(2)O with a mean Q(max) of 24 +/- 2 ml sec(-1). URA of 21 cmH(2)O defined the upper border of normality for the outflow condition. Schäfer's OCO showed the most consistent relationship between estimated urethral pressure at minimal flow and true measured urethral closure pressure. From a clinical perspective, the linear nomograms (ICS and Schäfer) are more easily accessible with the ICS BOOI and obstruction index being the simplest to calculate manually. Minimal differences found between these urodynamic nomograms confirm the clinical value of recommending a single method to facilitate future comparisons between studies.
Conclusions:
An upper limit of normality for the male outflow condition can be defined by an URA of 21 cmH(2)O, AGN of 40 cmH(2)O or OCO of 1. Results above these reference values should be considered abnormal in this age group and where identified in a different age-group should be explained by physiological or pathophysiological events.
More Related Videos
11:00Experimental Investigation of Secondary Flow Structures Downstream of a Model Type IV Stent Failure in a 180° Curved Artery Test Section
Published on: July 19, 2016
10:02Characterization of the Isolated, Ventilated, and Instrumented Mouse Lung Perfused with Pulsatile Flow
Published on: April 29, 2011
Related Concept Videos
Bernoulli's Equation for Flow Normal to a Streamline
The pressure difference depends on the fluid's velocity and radius of curvature. The pressure variation is minimal in flows with nearly straight streamlines. However, the...
Urodynamic Studies: Uroflowmetry
General Characteristics of Pipe Flow I
The classification of fluid...
Blood Pressure
Pressure of Fluids
Static, Stagnation, Dynamic and Total Pressure