Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Formative evaluation using checklists to improve research proposals.

Lynnda J Emery1, Carolyn Harvey, Catherine M Andersen

  • 1College of Health Sciences, Eastern Kentucky University, Richmond, Kentucky, USA.

Perspectives in Health Information Management
|December 11, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Self-identity in an adolescent a decade after spinal cord injury.

Occupational therapy in health care·2013
Same author

Functional performance and grip strength after total hip replacement.

Occupational therapy in health care·2013
Same author

Learning styles of university students in a Hispanic-serving institution.

Occupational therapy in health care·2013
Same author

Guidelines for selection of health information management software in outpatient practice.

Occupational therapy in health care·2013
Same author

An unexplained death in the psychiatric emergency room: a case of undiagnosed obstructive sleep apnea?

General hospital psychiatry·2008
Same author

Inducing coproporphyria in rat hepatocyte cultures using cyclic AMP and cyclic AMP-releasing agents.

Archives of toxicology·2005
Same journal

Research on Training Competent Health Information Management Professionals: Based on A Survey of Field Experts.

Perspectives in health information management·2025
Same journal

Improving Clinical Documentation with Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review.

Perspectives in health information management·2025
Same journal

Quality Assessment of the Road Traffic Health and Safety Apps with a Focus on the Five Rights of Information Management.

Perspectives in health information management·2023
Same journal

Medical Scribes: Symptom or Cause of Impeded Evolution of a Transformative Artificial Intelligence in the Electronic Health Record?

Perspectives in health information management·2023
Same journal

Best Practices for the Design of COVID-19 Dashboards.

Perspectives in health information management·2023
Same journal

Supporting HIM Professional Practice Experience Through Interprofessional Collaboration on Preceptor Orientation and Training.

Perspectives in health information management·2022
See all related articles

Faculty can use formative evaluation and checklists to teach students how to write research proposals involving human participants. This approach guides skill development for institutional review board (IRB) submissions and ethical research practices.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Research Ethics
  • Human Subject Research

Background:

  • Developing research proposals requires understanding institutional review board (IRB) processes.
  • Protecting human participants is a critical component of ethical research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe how faculty can use formative evaluation and checklists to guide students in writing research proposals for human participant studies.
  • To provide faculty with teaching principles for using these tools to foster skill development.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing formative evaluation techniques to critically review student work for improvement.
  • Providing checklists that summarize IRB criteria and essential research proposal content.
  • Discussing teaching principles for faculty to effectively guide students.
Keywords:
Clinical researchComplianceConfidentialityHealth information managementHuman participant protectionIRB checklistInstitutional review boardPrivacy

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Checklists summarizing IRB standards and critical proposal content are provided.
  • Formative evaluation is emphasized as a key process for improving student work.
  • Teaching principles are discussed to aid faculty in feedback and skill development.

Conclusions:

  • Faculty can effectively guide students in developing high-quality research proposals for human participant studies using formative evaluation and checklists.
  • These tools support student skill development in navigating the IRB approval process and ethical research conduct.