Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Advance decision.

Alec Samuels1, J P Barrister

  • 1alec.samuels@btinternet.com

Medicine, Science, and the Law
|December 12, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Patients in the UK can make advance decisions about medical treatment. While providing peace of mind, these decisions can pose challenges for healthcare professionals regarding clarity and implementation.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Suicide and coronial problems.

The Medico-legal journal·2022
Same author

Obstetrics and gynaecology and the law.

The Medico-legal journal·2022
Same author

Forensic Science Regulator: The Forensic Science Regulator Act 2021.

The Medico-legal journal·2022
Same author

A new wrinkle in Montgomery? The surgeon faces the unexpected.

The Medico-legal journal·2022
Same author

Assisted dying.

The Medico-legal journal·2022
Same author

Andrew Malkinson: A miscarriage of justice?

Medicine, science, and the law·2021

Area of Science:

  • Medical Law
  • Patient Rights
  • Healthcare Ethics

Background:

  • The UK grants patients a statutory right to refuse medical treatment.
  • Parliament has introduced 'advance decisions' allowing individuals to pre-specify treatment preferences.
  • Advance decisions aim to provide patient autonomy but may present practical difficulties for clinicians.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the conditions and procedures for creating valid advance decisions.
  • To identify potential challenges and problems encountered by healthcare professionals with advance decisions.
  • To discuss the implications of using layman's language in advance decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • Review of UK legislation pertaining to advance decisions.
  • Analysis of case law and professional guidelines related to patient consent and refusal.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of ethical considerations and practical challenges in implementing advance decisions.

    • Main Results:

    • Advance decisions are legally recognised but require specific conditions to be met.
    • Ambiguity in language, particularly layman's terms, can lead to interpretation issues for healthcare providers.
    • Potential conflicts may arise between the patient's stated wishes and the clinical judgment of healthcare professionals.

    Conclusions:

    • Advance decisions are a vital tool for patient autonomy in the UK.
    • Clear communication and precise documentation are crucial for the effective implementation of advance decisions.
    • Further guidance may be needed to address the challenges posed by layman's language in advance directives.