Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2026

Technique of Conjunctival Biopsy and Direct Immunofluorescence for Diagnosing Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid
Published on: June 17, 2025
Cervicovaginal involvement in pemphigus vulgaris: a clinical study of 77 cases
M Akhyani1, C Chams-Davatchi, Z Naraghi
1Department of Dermatology, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Razi Hospital, Tehran 1199663911, Iran.
Background:
Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) is an autoimmune blistering disease which is known to involve the female genital tract, but the frequency at which this occurs is unknown. There are few reports in the literature of the cytological appearance of PV on cervicovaginal smears.
Objectives:
To evaluate involvement of the female genital tract and the appearance of cervicovaginal Papanicolaou (Pap) smears in PV.
Methods:
The study included 77 patients with PV who attended between April 2005 and February 2007. Each patient was subjected to gynaecological examination and cervicovaginal Pap smear.
Results:
Genital lesions were observed in 39 patients (51%). Of these, the labia minora were involved in 36 patients (92%), the labia majora in 11 (28%), the vagina in 14 (36%) and the cervix in six (15%). Cervicovaginal Pap smears of 20 of 77 patients (26%) showed PV. Of 72 satisfactory Pap smears, the cervical Pap smear was normal in 25 patients (35%), inflammatory in 43 patients (60%), and dysplastic (low-grade squamous intraepithelial neoplasia) in four patients (6%).
Conclusions:
Involvement of the female genital tract with PV might not be as infrequent as was previously thought; it is probably the second most common mucosal site of PV after the oral mucosa. Genital lesions may be missed and the need for thorough pelvic examination should not be overlooked.
Related Concept Videos
Candidiasis
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.