Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Why do delayed summaries improve metacomprehension accuracy?

Mary C M Anderson1, Keith W Thiede

  • 1College of DuPage, 425 Fawell Boulevard, Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137, United States.

Acta Psychologica
|December 12, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The effects of comprehension-test expectancies on metacomprehension accuracy.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2018
Same author

Developing a Multi-Dimensional Early Elementary Mathematics Screener and Diagnostic Tool: The Primary Mathematics Assessment.

Early childhood education journal·2018
Same author

How restudy decisions affect overall comprehension for seventh-grade students.

The British journal of educational psychology·2017
Same author

Improving metacomprehension accuracy in an undergraduate course context.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2016
Same author

Exploring metacognitive accuracy in visual search.

Memory & cognition·2011
Same author

Test expectancy affects metacomprehension accuracy.

The British journal of educational psychology·2011
Same journal

Exploring the interactions between external support, internal psychological factors, and digital teaching competence: Evidence from a PLS-SEM model in Chinese rural teachers.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

Heterogeneity in moderation effects: How willingness-to-pay shapes the knowledge-behavior relationship in sustainable fashion consumption.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

Impact of early environmental unpredictability on impulsive consumption: Insights from life history theory.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

Pre-service foreign language teachers' acceptance of ChatGPT in microteaching lesson planning: A sequential mixed-methods study.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

AI-driven adaptive feedback and EFL writing performance: The roles of engagement, metacognition, and epistemic agency in a cross-linguistic context.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

Crawling into a hole: Attachment insecurity, shame, and hikikomori symptoms in an adolescent population.

Acta psychologica·2026
See all related articles

Writing summaries after a delay improves metacomprehension accuracy by focusing on text gist, unlike immediate summaries which focus on details. This finding supports the situation model hypothesis in comprehension monitoring.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Educational Psychology

Background:

  • Metacomprehension, or the ability to judge one's own understanding, is crucial for effective learning.
  • Previous research suggests that metacognitive judgments can be influenced by the strategies employed during learning.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effect of summary writing timing on metacomprehension accuracy.
  • To evaluate the accessibility hypothesis versus the situation model hypothesis in explaining the delayed-summarization effect.

Main Methods:

  • Eighty-seven college students participated in the study.
  • Participants wrote summaries of texts either immediately after reading or after a delay.
  • Metacomprehension accuracy was assessed by comparing participants' judgments of their comprehension with their actual performance.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Metacomprehension accuracy significantly improved when summaries were written after a delay.
  • Accuracy did not improve when summaries were written immediately after reading.
  • Delayed summarization led participants to focus more on the text's gist, while immediate summarization led to a focus on details.

Conclusions:

  • Generating summaries after a delay enhances metacomprehension by promoting a focus on the situation model (gist) of the text.
  • The findings support the situation model hypothesis, suggesting that deeper processing of text information improves self-monitoring accuracy.