A systematic density functional study of the zero-field splitting in Mn(II) coordination compounds
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2026

Measurement of Coherence Decay in GaMnAs Using Femtosecond Four-wave Mixing
Published on: December 3, 2013
Samir Zein1, Carole Duboc, Wolfgang Lubitz
1Institut für Physikalische und Theoretische Chemie, Universität Bonn, Wegelerstrasse 12, 53115, Bonn, Germany.
Abstract:
This work presents a detailed evaluation of the performance of density functional theory (DFT) for the prediction of zero-field splittings (ZFSs) in Mn(II) coordination complexes. Eighteen experimentally well characterized four-, five-, and six-coordinate complexes of the general formula [Mn(L)nL'2] with L' = Cl, Br, I, NCS, or N3 (L = an oligodentate ligand) are considered. Several DFT-based approaches for the prediction of the ZFSs are compared. For the estimation of the spin-orbit coupling (SOC) part of the ZFS, it was found that the Pederson-Khanna (PK) approach is more successful than the previously proposed quasi-restricted orbitals (QRO)-based method. In either case, accounting for the spin-spin (SS) interaction either with or without the inclusion of the spin-polarization effects improves the results. This argues for the physical necessity of accounting for this important contribution to the ZFS. On average, the SS contribution represents approximately 30% of the axial D parameters. In addition to the SS part, the SOC contributions of d-d spin flip (alphabeta) and ligand-to-metal charge transfer excited states (betabeta) were found to dominate the SOC part of the D parameter; the observed near cancellation between the alphaalpha and betaalpha parts is discussed in the framework of the PK model. The calculations systematically (correlation coefficient approximately 0.99) overestimate the experimental D values by approximately 60%. Comparison of the signs of calculated and measured D values shows that the signs of the calculated axial ZFS parameters are unreliable once E/D > 0.2. Finally, we find that the calculated D and E/D values are highly sensitive to small structural changes. It is observed that the use of theoretically optimized geometries leads to a significant deterioration of the theoretical predictions relative to the experimental geometries derived from X-ray diffraction. The standard deviation of the theoretical predictions for the D values almost doubles from approximately 0.1 to approximately 0.2 cm-1 upon using quantum chemically optimized structures. We do not find any noticeable improvement in considering basis sets larger than standard double- (SVP) or triple-zeta (TZVP) basis sets or using functionals other than the BP functional.
Related Concept Videos
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...
Crystal Field Theory - Octahedral Complexes
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...
Valence Bond Theory
Colors and Magnetism
When atoms or molecules absorb light at the proper frequency, their electrons are excited to higher-energy orbitals. For many main group atoms and molecules, the absorbed photons are in the ultraviolet range of the electromagnetic spectrum, which cannot be detected by the human eye. For coordination compounds, the energy difference between the d orbitals often allows photons in the visible range to be absorbed and emitted, which is seen as colors by the human eye.
Coordination Number and Geometry
Coordination Compounds and Nomenclature

