Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Secondary Motives: Affiliation Motivation and Aggression Motivation

Secondary Motives: Affiliation Motivation and Aggression Motivation

Affiliation motivation is the intrinsic desire to connect with others and belong to a social group, which plays a crucial role in forming and maintaining personal relationships. This type of motivation is essential for psychological well-being, as it provides individuals with a sense of community and support. An example of this is a student who joins a study group in order to feel a sense of connection. People with high affiliation motivation actively seek social approval, take satisfaction in...

Impact of Groups on Groups

Impact of Groups on Groups

Social psychologists analyze how groups influence one another, shaping social structures and interactions through both cooperation and competition. These dynamics manifest in various ways, ranging from economic partnerships to intergroup conflicts that shape societal structures and perceptions.Cooperation and Competition in Intergroup RelationsIntergroup relationships vary across contexts, sometimes fostering cooperation and mutual benefit while at other times leading to conflict and...

In- and Out-Groups

In- and Out-Groups

People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.

Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance

Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance

Avoidance-avoidance conflict refers to a psychological situation where a person must choose between two or more unpleasant alternatives. These conflicts are particularly stressful because neither option is desirable. This dilemma is often expressed in sayings like "caught between a rock and a hard place" or "between the devil and the deep blue sea." For instance, individuals who fear dental procedures may find themselves torn between enduring a painful toothache or facing the anxiety of...

Secondary Motives: Power Motivation and Achievement Motivation

Secondary Motives: Power Motivation and Achievement Motivation

Power motivation and achievement motivation are two essential social motives identified by psychologist David McClelland. These motives influence behavior in various personal and professional contexts, shaping how individuals interact with others and pursue their goals.
Power motivation is characterized by the desire to influence, control, or have an impact on others. It is shaped by an individual's experiences, social environment, and cultural context. People with high power motivation are...

Social Proof

Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Double-decision Response Time Models of Recall and Recognition Support Resource Accounts of Visual Working Memory.

Computational brain & behavior·2026

Same author

Tracing the neural trajectories of evidence accumulation and motor preparation processes during voluntary decisions.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026

Same author

Evaluating malaria elimination strategies among military forces in Cambodia: a multi-arm clinical trial comparing monthly prophylaxis and focused screening and treatment.

BMC infectious diseases·2025

Same author

Unifying approaches to understanding capacity in change detection.

Psychological review·2024

Same author

Teamwork and implementation of innovations in healthcare and human service settings: a systematic review.

Implementation science : IS·2024

Same author

The parasite intraerythrocytic cycle and human circadian cycle are coupled during malaria infection.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2023

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 9, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Conflicting social motives in negotiating groups.

Laurie R Weingart¹, Jeanne M Brett, Mara Olekalns

¹David A. Tepper School of Business, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburg, PA 15213, USA. weingart@cmu.edu

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

|December 13, 2007

Summary

Cooperative negotiators adapt their strategies based on group composition, unlike individualistic negotiators. This study reveals how social motives impact negotiation tactics within diverse groups.

More Related Videos

The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test

The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test

Published on: November 19, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 9, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test

The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test

Published on: November 19, 2015

Area of Science:

Social Psychology
Behavioral Economics
Game Theory

Background:

Negotiator social motives, such as cooperative or individualistic orientations, significantly shape negotiation strategies.
Understanding how group dynamics and composition interact with individual motives is crucial for effective negotiation.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the influence of negotiators' social motives and group composition on negotiation strategies.
To analyze how cooperative and individualistic negotiators adapt their tactics in homogeneous and heterogeneous groups.

Main Methods:

Utilized multilevel modeling and sequential analysis of negotiation strategies.
Videotaped and transcribed interactions of four-person groups engaged in a 5-issue mixed-motive task.
Examined group compositions ranging from homogeneous (all cooperators or all individualists) to heterogeneous (mixed ratios).

Main Results:

Cooperative negotiators dynamically adjusted their use of integrative and distributive strategies based on group composition.
Individualistic negotiators demonstrated less adaptability in their strategic choices regardless of group makeup.
Sequential analysis indicated that cooperators responded more systematically to others' behaviors and redirected negotiations based on group composition.

Conclusions:

Social motives critically influence adaptive negotiation behavior, with cooperators showing greater flexibility.
Group composition acts as a significant contextual factor that cooperative negotiators utilize to modify their strategies.
Individualistic negotiators' strategies appear less sensitive to the social-motive composition of the group.