Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Anisotropic imaging performance in breast tomosynthesis.

Aldo Badano1, Iacovos S Kyprianou, Robert J Jennings

  • 1Division of Imaging and Applied Mathematics, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland 20993, USA. aldo.badano@fda.hhs.gov

Medical Physics
|December 14, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Synthetic data in radiological imaging: current state and future outlook.

BJR artificial intelligence·2026
Same author

Synthetic skin image generation using a physics-based, object-to-image computational pipeline.

International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery·2026
Same author

On the robustness of the Transit-Guided Radiation Therapy technique against variations in linac operating conditions.

Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB)·2025
Same author

Scorecard for synthetic medical data evaluation.

Communications engineering·2025
Same author

Medical Imaging Data Strategies for Catalyzing AI Medical Device Innovation.

Journal of imaging informatics in medicine·2025
Same author

Longitudinal in silico imaging study comparing digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis systems.

Medical physics·2024
Same journal

Correction to "On the shape of the radiation survival curve in tumor spheroids: The role of oxygen heterogeneity".

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Multi-view constrained semi-supervised vertebra detection for 3D ultrasound spine volume.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Accuracy of quantitative <sup>177</sup>Lu SPECT/CT imaging: A systematic review.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Physics-constrained dual-domain network for CBCT reconstruction from orthogonal X-rays in gynecologic radiotherapy.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Decomposition-based harmonization for quantitative PET imaging across scanners and radiotracers.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Development and evaluation of an in vivo dose-based monitoring system for electron FLASH radiation therapy.

Medical physics·2026
See all related articles

Anisotropy in breast tomosynthesis imaging performance due to oblique x-ray incidence was studied. Results show detector response varies significantly with x-ray angle, impacting image quality.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Radiological Physics
  • Materials Science

Background:

  • Indirect detectors in breast tomosynthesis utilize columnar scintillator screens.
  • Oblique x-ray incidence can cause anisotropy in imaging performance.
  • Accurate modeling is crucial for understanding detector behavior and optimizing image quality.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the anisotropy in imaging performance of indirect detectors for breast tomosynthesis.
  • To model the effects of oblique x-ray incidence on detector response using Monte Carlo simulations.
  • To assess the impact of anisotropy on spatial blur and noise characteristics.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized MANTIS, a Monte Carlo transport package, to model x-ray and light interactions in columnar scintillator screens.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Simulated polyenergetic x-ray spectra using experimental data for Mo/Mo, Rh/Rh, and W/Al sources.
  • Filtered spectra with breast tissue, compression paddle, and support base at various oblique incidence angles.

    • Main Results:

    • Detector response was found to be nonsymmetrical, with spatial blur varying significantly with x-ray incidence angle.
    • Noise due to light photon detection variability changed minimally with incidence angle.
    • Anisotropy persisted in screens with absorptive backings, and noise increased with depth-dependent light output variations.

    Conclusions:

    • Anisotropic imaging performance in breast tomosynthesis detectors is significant and angle-dependent.
    • Incorporating anisotropy into reconstruction algorithms can improve image quality.
    • Assessing image quality requires a comprehensive detector response description beyond central measurements.