Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2026

A Whole Body Dosimetry Protocol for Peptide-Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT): 2D Planar Image and Hybrid 2D+3D SPECT/CT Image Methods
Published on: April 24, 2020
CELLDOSE: a Monte Carlo code to assess electron dose distribution--S values for 131I in spheres of various sizes
Christophe Champion1, Paolo Zanotti-Fregonara, Elif Hindié
1Laboratoire de Physique Moléculaire et des Collisions, Université Paul Verlaine-Metz, Institut de Physique, Metz, France. champion@univ-metz.fr
Unlabelled:
Monte Carlo simulation can be particularly suitable for modeling the microscopic distribution of energy received by normal tissues or cancer cells and for evaluating the relative merits of different radiopharmaceuticals. We used a new code, CELLDOSE, to assess electron dose for isolated spheres with radii varying from 2,500 mum down to 0.05 mum, in which (131)I is homogeneously distributed.
Methods:
All electron emissions of (131)I were considered, including the whole beta(- 131)I spectrum, 108 internal conversion electrons, and 21 Auger electrons. The Monte Carlo track-structure code used follows all electrons down to an energy threshold E(cutoff) = 7.4 eV.
Results:
Calculated S values were in good agreement with published analytic methods, lying in between reported results for all experimental points. Our S values were also close to other published data using a Monte Carlo code. Contrary to the latter published results, our results show that dose distribution inside spheres is not homogeneous, with the dose at the outmost layer being approximately half that at the center. The fraction of electron energy retained within the spheres decreased with decreasing radius (r): 87.1% for r = 2,500 mum, 8.73% for r = 50 mum, and 1.18% for r = 5 mum. Thus, a radioiodine concentration that delivers a dose of 100 Gy to a micrometastasis of 2,500 mum radius would deliver 10 Gy in a cluster of 50 mum and only 1.4 Gy in an isolated cell. The specific contribution from Auger electrons varied from 0.25% for the largest sphere up to 76.8% for the smallest sphere.
Conclusion:
The dose to a tumor cell will depend on its position in a metastasis. For the treatment of very small metastases, (131)I may not be the isotope of choice. When trying to kill isolated cells or a small cluster of cells with (131)I, it is important to get the iodine as close as possible to the nucleus to get the enhancement factor from Auger electrons. The Monte Carlo code CELLDOSE can be used to assess the electron map deposit for any isotope.
More Related Videos
06:20Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
Published on: March 11, 2021
10:33Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification (ADCI) and Dose Estimation
Published on: September 4, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Biological Effects of Radiation
Electric Field of a Non Uniformly Charged Sphere
Consider a non-uniformly charged sphere, for which the density of charge depends only on the distance from a point in space and not on the direction. Such a sphere has a spherically symmetrical charge distribution. Here, the electric...
Radiation: Applications
The average...
Maxwell-Boltzmann Distribution: Problem Solving
This distribution function f(v) is defined by saying that the expected number N (v1,v2) of particles with speeds between v1 and v2 is given by