Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Parallel Processing01:20

Parallel Processing

The brain processes sensory information rapidly due to parallel processing, which involves sending data across multiple neural pathways at the same time. This method allows the brain to manage various sensory qualities, such as shapes, colors, movements, and locations, all concurrently. For instance, when observing a forest landscape, the brain simultaneously processes the movement of leaves, the shapes of trees, the depth between them, and the various shades of green. This enables a quick and...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Do all subjects fit the same recognition memory model? Comparisons of continuous, discrete, and hybrid models using extended multinomial processing trees.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same author

Promoting physical activity during retirement age with psychological components: multilevel meta-analysis.

Health psychology review·2025
Same author

Reformulating the meta-analytical random effects model of the standardized mean difference as a mixture model.

Behavior research methods·2025
Same author

Self-awareness interventions after acquired brain injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Rehabilitation psychology·2025
Same author

Moderators analysis in meta-analysis: Meta-regression and subgroups analyzes.

Cirugia espanola·2024
Same author

Protocol for the Acclimatization of Coconut Vitro-Plants Under Ex Vitro Conditions.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 9, 2026

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

Parallel processing of stimulus features during RSVP: evidence from the second response.

Juan Botella1, María Narváez, Manuel Suero

  • 1Autónoma University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain. juan.botella@uam.es

Perception & Psychophysics
|December 15, 2007
PubMed
Summary

Observers often make errors in rapid serial visual presentation tasks, reporting features from nearby stimuli. This study confirms that multiple response features are available and chosen similarly for first and second responses, with some pure guessing in second responses.

More Related Videos

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
08:45

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners
09:52

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

Published on: May 31, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 9, 2026

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
08:45

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners
09:52

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

Published on: May 31, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Visual Perception
  • Human Factors

Background:

  • Observers frequently misreport target features in rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) tasks, often reporting features from adjacent stimuli, known as illusory conjunctions in time.
  • Parallel processing models suggest that response features are extracted during RSVP, and performance relies on guessing when binding processes fail at high presentation rates.
  • The assumption of multiple available response features lacks direct empirical validation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To empirically test the hypothesis that observers possess more than one response feature available for selection during RSVP tasks.
  • To investigate the decision-making process for both first and second response candidates using a double response paradigm.
  • To validate a computational model predicting the ratios of second response choices based on first response data.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments employed a double response paradigm where participants reported their first and second response candidates for a target in an RSVP stream.
  • The constant ratio rule, derived from Botella et al.'s (2001) model, was applied to first response data to predict the proportions of choices for second responses.
  • Correlations between observed and predicted response proportions were calculated to assess model fit.

Main Results:

  • High correlations (r = .887 and .956) were found between observed and predicted response proportions across both experiments.
  • The results strongly support the existence of multiple available response features for observers.
  • Model predictions were further refined by accounting for a proportion of pure guesses in second responses, attributed to memory or identification errors.

Conclusions:

  • The study provides direct empirical support for the multiple extractions assumption in RSVP.
  • Observer response selection is largely consistent for both initial and subsequent response candidates.
  • Performance decrements in second responses can be partly explained by guessing due to factors like memory limitations and feature misidentification.