Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments02:46

Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments

Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this particular...
Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

PDA (Privacy-Preserving Distributed Algorithms) in action: ten principles for high-quality multi-site clinical evidence generation.

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA·2026
Same author

A Chromosome-Level Genome Assembly of Sitotroga cerealella (Olivier, 1789) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), a Global Pest of Stored Grains.

Scientific data·2026
Same author

Nonparametric Density Estimation of a Long-Term Trend from Repeated Semicontinuous Data.

Journal of the American Statistical Association·2026
Same author

Generative AI-assisted Bayesian-frequentist Hybrid Inference in Single-cell RNA Sequencing Analysis for Genes Associated with Alzheimer's Disease.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Application of the Total Nutrient Index as a Precision Nutrition Tool to Address Dietary Recommendations Across the Life Course.

Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics·2026
Same author

Macrophages and Tissue Homeostasis: From Physiological Functions to Disease Onset.

Frontiers in bioscience (Landmark edition)·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 9, 2026

Laser-heating and Radiance Spectrometry for the Study of Nuclear Materials in Conditions Simulating a Nuclear Power Plant Accident
09:18

Laser-heating and Radiance Spectrometry for the Study of Nuclear Materials in Conditions Simulating a Nuclear Power Plant Accident

Published on: December 14, 2017

Shared uncertainty in measurement error problems, with application to Nevada Test Site fallout data.

Yehua Li1, Annamaria Guolo, F Owen Hoffman

  • 1Department of Statistics, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30605, USA.

Biometrics
|December 15, 2007
PubMed
Summary

Accurate radiation dose reconstruction is crucial for understanding thyroid disease risks. New statistical methods accounting for complex measurement errors reveal a strong dose-response relationship in the Nevada Test Site Study.

More Related Videos

Measurements of Soil Carbon by Neutron-Gamma Analysis in Static and Scanning Modes
07:51

Measurements of Soil Carbon by Neutron-Gamma Analysis in Static and Scanning Modes

Published on: August 24, 2017

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
10:22

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 9, 2026

Laser-heating and Radiance Spectrometry for the Study of Nuclear Materials in Conditions Simulating a Nuclear Power Plant Accident
09:18

Laser-heating and Radiance Spectrometry for the Study of Nuclear Materials in Conditions Simulating a Nuclear Power Plant Accident

Published on: December 14, 2017

Measurements of Soil Carbon by Neutron-Gamma Analysis in Static and Scanning Modes
07:51

Measurements of Soil Carbon by Neutron-Gamma Analysis in Static and Scanning Modes

Published on: August 24, 2017

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
10:22

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Radiation epidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Environmental health

Background:

  • Estimating historical radiation doses often relies on mathematical models due to lack of direct measurements.
  • Dose estimates can have significant errors, including classical measurement errors and correlated Berkson errors, as seen in the Nevada Test Site (NTS) Thyroid Disease Study.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and apply statistical methods for radiation dose inference that account for complex error structures.
  • To accurately quantify the dose-response relationship between radiation exposure and thyroid disease risk.

Main Methods:

  • Development of Bayesian methods using Markov chain Monte Carlo and Monte-Carlo expectation-maximization, incorporating a Metropolis-Hastings step.
  • Evaluation of regression calibration methods, highlighting their inability to utilize correlated Berkson error structures.

Main Results:

  • Application of the developed methods to the NTS Study demonstrated a strong dose-response relationship between radiation dose and thyroiditis.
  • Regression calibration and use of expectation values for individual doses can significantly underestimate excess relative risk and its confidence intervals.

Conclusions:

  • Accurate quantification of dose-response relationships requires full consideration of mixed classical and Berkson uncertainties in reconstructed doses.
  • Advanced statistical methods are essential for reliable risk assessment in radiation epidemiology when dealing with complex dose estimation errors.