Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2026

06:25
Cooling or Warming the Esophagus to Reduce Esophageal Injury During Left Atrial Ablation in the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: March 15, 2020
Dynamic skin cooling with an environmentally compatible alternative cryogen during laser surgery
Wangcun Jia1, Lars O Svaasand, Thang B Nguyen
1Beckman Laser Institute, University of California-Irvine, 1002 Health Sciences Road East, Irvine, CA 92612, USA. wjia@uci.edu
Lasers in Surgery and Medicine
|December 18, 2007
Summary
Liquid carbon dioxide (CO(2)) offers comparable skin cooling to tetrafluoroethane (R134a) for laser surgery. Despite higher CO(2) consumption, its significantly lower global warming potential makes it an environmentally preferable cryogen for dermatologic procedures.
Area of Science:
- Dermatology
- Laser Surgery
- Cryogenics
- Environmental Science
Background:
- Tetrafluoroethane (R134a) is utilized for epidermal cooling during laser surgery but possesses a high global warming potential (GWP=1300).
- A need exists for alternative cryogens with reduced environmental impact for dermatologic procedures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the cooling effectiveness of liquid carbon dioxide (CO(2)), a cryogen with a low GWP (1), as an alternative to R134a.
- To compare the cooling performance and physical properties of CO(2) and R134a sprays.
Main Methods:
- Surface temperature (T(s)) measurements on an epoxy skin phantom using thin-film thermocouples.
- Estimation of temperature distribution via T(s) and Duhamel's method.
- Measurement of impact pressure, noise level, and cryogen consumption for both R134a and CO(2) sprays.
Main Results:
- CO(2) sprays achieved lower minimum surface temperatures than R134a sprays with spurt durations exceeding 35 milliseconds.
- Numerical simulations indicated comparable temperature reductions between CO(2) and R134a with optimized spray parameters.
- CO(2) sprays exhibited higher impact pressure (43.1 kPa vs 3.6 kPa) and noise levels (135 dBA vs 109 dBA) but lower GWP than R134a.
Conclusions:
- Liquid carbon dioxide (CO(2)) demonstrates comparable skin cooling efficacy to tetrafluoroethane (R134a) for dermatologic laser surgery.
- Despite higher consumption, CO(2)'s significantly lower global warming potential presents a more environmentally sustainable option.
- Further research is needed to evaluate in vivo effects on human skin and cutaneous blood flow.

