Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2026

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
[Influence of cardiopathy etiology on responses to cardiac resynchronization therapy]
Bàrbara Vidal1, Marta Sitges, Victoria Delgado
1Institut Clínic del Tòrax, Hospital Clínic, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, España.
Insights
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves heart function and reduces ventricular size in patients with systolic dysfunction and left bundle branch block (LBBB). The benefits of CRT for reverse left ventricular remodeling are consistent regardless of the underlying cause of heart disease.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a treatment for heart failure.
- The impact of cardiopathy etiology on CRT response is not well understood.
- Reverse left ventricular remodeling is a key indicator of treatment success.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how the cause of heart disease (cardiopathy etiology) affects the success of CRT in improving left ventricular remodeling.
- To assess the influence of cardiopathy etiology on CRT's impact on reverse left ventricular remodeling.
Main Methods:
- 106 patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and left bundle branch block (LBBB) receiving CRT were studied.
- Clinical and echocardiographic data were collected at baseline and at 6 and 12 months post-implantation.
- Measurements included left ventricular dimensions, volume, systolic function (LVEF), and mitral regurgitation.
Main Results:
- CRT significantly reduced left ventricular volume and diameter, and improved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and mitral regurgitation.
- These improvements occurred irrespective of whether the heart disease was ischemic or idiopathic in origin.
- No significant differences in clinical response rates were observed between patients with ischemic versus non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy.
Conclusions:
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) leads to significant reverse left ventricular remodeling and clinical improvement in patients with systolic dysfunction and left bundle branch block (LBBB).
- The etiology of the underlying cardiopathy does not appear to influence the effectiveness of CRT in achieving reverse ventricular remodeling at 12-month follow-up.
Introduction And Objectives:
Little is known about how responses to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) are affected by the nature of the underlying cardiopathy. The aim of this study was to investigate how cardiopathy etiology influences the effect of CRT on reverse left ventricular remodeling.
Methods:
The study included 106 patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and left bundle branch block (LBBB) who were receiving CRT. Clinical and echocardiographic investigations were performed at baseline before implantation and at 6 and 12 month follow-up to determine left ventricular diameter, volume and systolic function, and to quantify mitral regurgitation.
Results:
During follow-up, it was observed that CRT reduced left ventricular volume and diameter, increased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and reduced mitral regurgitation severity irrespective of the etiology of the cardiopathy. In patients with ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy, LVEF increased by 34% and end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes decreased by 4% and 12%, respectively; in those with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, LVEF increased by 38% and end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes decreased by 13% and 19%, respectively (P=NS for ischemic vs. non-ischemic disease). Nor were differences observed between the groups in clinical outcome: 74% of the ischemic group responded compared with 62% of the non-ischemic group (P=NS).
Conclusions:
At 12-month follow-up, patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and LBBB treated by CRT showed clinical improvements and demonstrated reverse ventricular remodeling, irrespective of the etiology of their cardiopathy.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Cardiomyopathy I: Introduction and Classification
