Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

An unusual cause of obstructing laryngeal edema: Forestier's disease. <b>Case report and literature review</b>.

Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis·2026
Same author

Side correlation between subjective visual vertical tilt and symptoms in migraine with vertigo.

Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale·2026
Same author

Switching to dupilumab from other biologic therapies in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSWNP): a comparison with biologic-naïve patients.

European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery·2026
Same author

Horizontal head-shaking test: pathophysiological mechanisms and clinical interpretation.

Frontiers in neurology·2026
Same author

Trigeminal Nerve and Vestibular System: Update on Pathophysiological and Clinical Links.

Audiology research·2025
Same author

Optimising care for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps and asthma in multimorbid patients: a multidisciplinary Delphi consensus.

Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 9, 2026

Assessment of Static Graviceptive Perception in the Roll-Plane using the Subjective Visual Vertical Paradigm
06:30

Assessment of Static Graviceptive Perception in the Roll-Plane using the Subjective Visual Vertical Paradigm

Published on: April 28, 2020

Determining subjective visual vertical: dynamic versus static testing.

Mario Faralli1, Giampietro Ricci, Egisto Molini

  • 1Otolaryngology and Cervicofacial Surgery Division, Department of Medical-Surgical Specialization, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Otology & Neurotology : Official Publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [And] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology
|December 18, 2007
PubMed
Summary

The dynamic visual vertical test is more sensitive than the static test for diagnosing unilateral vestibular dysfunction in the weeks following symptom onset. This enhanced sensitivity helps identify more cases, reducing the risk of false negatives compared to static testing alone.

More Related Videos

Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients
07:06

Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients

Published on: March 29, 2022

Dynamic Visual Tests to Identify and Quantify Visual Damage and Repair Following Demyelination in Optic Neuritis Patients
12:23

Dynamic Visual Tests to Identify and Quantify Visual Damage and Repair Following Demyelination in Optic Neuritis Patients

Published on: April 14, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 9, 2026

Assessment of Static Graviceptive Perception in the Roll-Plane using the Subjective Visual Vertical Paradigm
06:30

Assessment of Static Graviceptive Perception in the Roll-Plane using the Subjective Visual Vertical Paradigm

Published on: April 28, 2020

Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients
07:06

Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients

Published on: March 29, 2022

Dynamic Visual Tests to Identify and Quantify Visual Damage and Repair Following Demyelination in Optic Neuritis Patients
12:23

Dynamic Visual Tests to Identify and Quantify Visual Damage and Repair Following Demyelination in Optic Neuritis Patients

Published on: April 14, 2014

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Ophthalmology
  • Audiology

Background:

  • Unilateral vestibular dysfunction can significantly impact a patient's sense of orientation.
  • Accurate assessment of subjective visual vertical (SVV) is crucial for diagnosing and managing vestibular disorders.
  • Existing static testing methods may have limitations in sensitivity, particularly in the early stages of dysfunction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To comparatively evaluate the diagnostic utility of static and dynamic visual vertical tests.
  • To determine the sensitivity and specificity of each test in patients with unilateral vestibular dysfunction.
  • To assess the performance of both tests over time following the onset of vertigo.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective study involving 42 patients diagnosed with unilateral vestibular dysfunction.
  • Subjective visual vertical was assessed using both static and dynamic visual reference tests at 1-2 days, 8-10 days, and 90 days post-vertigo onset.
  • Sensitivity and specificity of each testing method were calculated.

Main Results:

  • The dynamic test demonstrated higher sensitivity (91.3%, 86.8%, 78.1%) compared to the static test (85.7%, 73.3%, 59.5%) across the three assessment points.
  • Specificity was high for both tests, with the static test achieving 100% and the dynamic test 96.7%.
  • The dynamic test showed a more sustained diagnostic capability in the initial weeks after vestibular dysfunction onset.

Conclusions:

  • The dynamic visual vertical test is more effective than static testing for evaluating patients in the early weeks after unilateral vestibular dysfunction.
  • The superior sensitivity of the dynamic test aids in minimizing perception error and identifying false negatives.
  • Dynamic testing offers a more reliable assessment tool for subjective visual vertical in this patient population.