Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is called the fundamental attribution...
Blinding01:11

Blinding

Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
Introspection01:29

Introspection

Introspection, long upheld as a reliable route to self-knowledge, involves examining one's thoughts, emotions, and mental processes. It underpins many psychological practices, from mindfulness meditation to psychotherapy and self-help strategies. However, empirical evidence challenges the accuracy of introspection as a means of understanding oneself.Limitations of Introspective InsightSeminal work by Nisbett and Wilson demonstrated that individuals are frequently unaware of the true causes...
Halo Effect01:27

Halo Effect

The halo effect is a cognitive bias in which an individual's overall impression influences judgments about their specific traits. This psychological phenomenon leads people to associate positive characteristics with those they perceive as generally good and negative characteristics with those they view as bad. This effect is particularly influential in social perception, professional evaluations, and decision-making processes.The Psychological Basis of the Halo EffectThe halo effect is rooted...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Est-ce que c'est vous même dans la glace?--the phenomenology of Rorschach expressive constraint.

Bulletin de la Societe des sciences medicales du Grand-Duche de Luxembourg·2008
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 9, 2026

Uncovering Hidden Dynamics of Natural Photonic Structures Using Holographic Imaging
05:45

Uncovering Hidden Dynamics of Natural Photonic Structures Using Holographic Imaging

Published on: March 31, 2022

The Rorschach butterfly effect: it L.L. a mistake.

Michael G King1

  • 1Sebastopol Medical Clinic, Sebastopol, Victoria 3352, Australia. drking@literallygifted.com

Bulletin De La Societe Des Sciences Medicales Du Grand-Duche De Luxembourg
|December 19, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Errors in Rorschach coding, particularly with Beck's adaptation, have led to significant discrepancies and interpretive errors. A review suggests a potential need for a new approach to Rorschach interpretation in the 21st century.

More Related Videos

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans
11:09

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans

Published on: July 17, 2021

The Crossmodal Congruency Task as a Means to Obtain an Objective Behavioral Measure in the Rubber Hand Illusion Paradigm
06:43

The Crossmodal Congruency Task as a Means to Obtain an Objective Behavioral Measure in the Rubber Hand Illusion Paradigm

Published on: July 26, 2013

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 9, 2026

Uncovering Hidden Dynamics of Natural Photonic Structures Using Holographic Imaging
05:45

Uncovering Hidden Dynamics of Natural Photonic Structures Using Holographic Imaging

Published on: March 31, 2022

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans
11:09

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans

Published on: July 17, 2021

The Crossmodal Congruency Task as a Means to Obtain an Objective Behavioral Measure in the Rubber Hand Illusion Paradigm
06:43

The Crossmodal Congruency Task as a Means to Obtain an Objective Behavioral Measure in the Rubber Hand Illusion Paradigm

Published on: July 26, 2013

Area of Science:

  • Psychological assessment
  • Psychometrics
  • Clinical psychology

Background:

  • Rorschach ink-blot test coding and interpretation have historically faced challenges with accuracy.
  • Discrepancies have been reported even in basic scoring tasks, impacting the reliability of results.
  • A review of foundational assumptions revealed a persistent location aberration originating from Beck's adaptation of Klopfer's work, perpetuated by Exner.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and analyze the root causes of persistent errors in Rorschach coding and interpretation.
  • To investigate the impact of a specific location aberration on the accuracy of Rorschach assessments.
  • To evaluate the potential effectiveness of reviewing existing data versus developing a new Rorschach approach for future use.

Main Methods:

  • Review of historical Rorschach adaptation and scoring methodologies.
  • Analysis of underlying assumptions in Rorschach coding, focusing on Beck's and Exner's contributions.
  • Examination of specific coding errors (e.g., D3/Dd28, "o"/"u") within a critical domain (Card II).

Main Results:

  • A long-standing location aberration in Rorschach coding, originating from Beck's adaptation and continued through Exner, has been identified.
  • Specific coding errors in a frequently analyzed area of Card II (location codes D3/Dd28, "o"/"u") can lead to a cascade of interpretive errors.
  • The cumulative effect of these errors on the vast Rorschach database remains uncertain.

Conclusions:

  • The identified location aberration and subsequent coding errors represent a significant issue in Rorschach interpretation.
  • It is unclear if re-evaluating existing Rorschach data can rectify the cumulative errors.
  • Developing a novel approach to Rorschach assessment may be necessary for accurate interpretation in the 21st century.