Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Bootstrap confidence intervals in multi-level simultaneous component analysis.

Marieke E Timmerman1, Henk A L Kiers, Age K Smilde

  • 1Heymans Institute for Psychology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. m.e.timmerman@rug.nl

The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology
|December 19, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Neuropsychological impairments in emotion recognition compared to general cognition: profiles across six different neurological disorders.

Journal of neurology·2026
Same author

External Validation of a Prognostic Model for Outcome After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury at 6 Months Post Injury.

European journal of neurology·2026
Same author

Remembering affect between moments: assessing peak-end effects in continuous affect measures.

Cognition & emotion·2026
Same author

Analysis of microbiome high-dimensional experimental design data using generalized linear models and ANOVA simultaneous component analysis.

Frontiers in microbiomes·2026
Same author

Statistical process control for real-time monitoring in clinical psychology: State of the art and future research agenda.

Neuroscience applied·2026
Same author

Unravelling the small sample bias in AR(1) models: The pros and cons of available bias correction methods.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2026
Same journal

Proficiency order invariance of MLE, MAP, EAP, and WLE in item response theory.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2026
Same journal

Bias and precision in true-score estimation.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2026
Same journal

Polychoric correlations under the assumption of elliptical latent traits.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2026
Same journal

Regularized reduced rank regression for mixed predictor and response variables.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2026
Same journal

A multiple-choice SDT model for cognitive diagnosis models.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2026
Same journal

Modular item response and structural equation modelling via measurement and uncertainty preserving parametric modelling.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2026
See all related articles

Bootstrap confidence intervals (CIs) offer reliable parameter estimation for multi-level simultaneous component analysis (MLSCA) in hierarchically structured data. Sufficient sample sizes at random levels are crucial for accurate MLSCA results.

Area of Science:

  • Multivariate statistics
  • Data analysis methodologies
  • Psychometrics

Background:

  • Hierarchically structured data is common in various scientific fields.
  • Existing methods may not adequately capture complex relationships within such data.
  • Multi-level simultaneous component analysis (MLSCA) offers a framework for analyzing this data structure.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate different bootstrap strategies for estimating confidence intervals (CIs) in MLSCA.
  • To address challenges related to resampling schemes and parameter non-uniqueness in MLSCA.
  • To assess the quality of bootstrap CIs for MLSCA parameters through simulation.

Main Methods:

  • Exploration of bootstrap resampling schemes tailored to hierarchical data structures.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Investigation of parameter non-uniqueness in different MLSCA variants.
  • Conducting a comparative simulation study to assess bootstrap CI performance.
  • Application of bootstrap CIs to an empirical dataset.

    • Main Results:

    • Bootstrap confidence intervals generally provide good parameter estimation in MLSCA.
    • Sufficient sample sizes at random hierarchical levels are essential for reliable CIs.
    • Increased complexity (more random levels) necessitates a dramatic increase in total observations.

    Conclusions:

    • Bootstrap methods are effective for inferential analysis in MLSCA.
    • Careful consideration of sample size and hierarchical structure is vital for accurate MLSCA.
    • The study provides practical guidance on applying bootstrap CIs in MLSCA.