Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Predicting toxicity through computers: a changing world.

Emilio Benfenati1

  • 1Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Milano, Italy. benfenati@marionegri.it

Chemistry Central Journal
|December 20, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Scientific Opinion on Benzophenone - 4 (CAS No. 4065-45-6, EC No. 223-772-2) used in cosmetics products - SCCS/1660/23.

NAM journal·2026
Same author

SCCS opinion on biphenyl-2-ol and sodium 2-biphenylolate used in cosmetic products (CAS/EC No. 90-43-7/201-993-5 and 132-27-4/205-055-6)- SCCS/1669/24.

NAM journal·2026
Same author

In silico prediction of Ames mutagenicity for organosilicon compounds: Exploring and enhancing chemical space boundaries.

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2026
Same author

Simulation of fish chronic toxicity using the Las Vegas algorithm and the vector of ideality of correlation.

Environmental toxicology and chemistry·2026
Same author

A framework for chemical hazard assessments under 'Safe and Sustainable by Design' using multiple in silico tools.

Integrated environmental assessment and management·2026
Same author

QSAR Models for Repeated Dose Toxicity in Rats Using the CORAL Software.

Toxics·2026
Same journal

Microwave synthesis, crystal structure, antioxidant, and antimicrobial study of new 6-heptyl-5,6-dihydrobenzo[4,5]imidazo[1,2-c]quinazoline compound.

Chemistry Central journal·2018
Same journal

Determination of antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of the extracts of aerial parts of Portulaca quadrifida.

Chemistry Central journal·2018
Same journal

Design, synthesis and therapeutic potential of 3-(2-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-ylthio)acetamido)-N-(substituted phenyl)benzamide analogues.

Chemistry Central journal·2018
Same journal

Analysis of coumarin and angelica lactones in smokeless tobacco products.

Chemistry Central journal·2018
Same journal

Novel glitazones as PPARγ agonists: molecular design, synthesis, glucose uptake activity and 3D QSAR studies.

Chemistry Central journal·2018
Same journal

Development of a practical synthesis of etravirine via a microwave-promoted amination.

Chemistry Central journal·2018
See all related articles

Computational toxicity prediction models are rapidly advancing with new chemical descriptors. Robust quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models are essential for regulatory compliance and require adaptable tools and transparent methods.

Area of Science:

  • Computational toxicology
  • Cheminformatics
  • Regulatory science

Background:

  • Computational toxicity prediction methods are rapidly evolving.
  • New methods for describing chemical information are emerging.
  • Regulations like REACH demand increasingly robust predictive models.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline factors influencing the evolution of quantitative structure-regulatory activity relationship (QSAR) models.
  • To highlight the need for adaptable and legally compliant QSAR models.
  • To emphasize the importance of transparency and reproducibility in model development.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of factors in QSAR model evolution.
  • Consideration of regulatory requirements for model validation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Emphasis on adaptable tools and input/output compliance.

    • Main Results:

    • QSAR models require powerful tools and adaptation for specific applications.
    • Suitable input values and legally compliant outputs are crucial.
    • Transparency and reproducibility are key factors for model acceptance.

    Conclusions:

    • Embracing new theoretical possibilities is vital for advancing QSAR.
    • Combining efforts promotes the development of flexible, modular tools.
    • Robust and transparent QSAR models are necessary for regulatory compliance.