Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2026
08:05
A Procedure to Study Stress-Induced Relapse of Heroin Seeking after Punishment-Imposed Abstinence
Published on: March 23, 2022
More 'altruistic' punishment in larger societies
Frank W Marlowe1, J Colette Berbesque
1Department of Anthropology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA. fmarlowe@fsu.edu
Proceedings. Biological Sciences
|December 20, 2007
Summary
Strong reciprocity, involving punishing non-cooperators, promotes cooperation. This study found that larger, more complex societies exhibit significantly higher levels of third-party punishment compared to small-scale societies.
Area of Science:
- Social Sciences
- Behavioral Economics
- Anthropology
Background:
- Strong reciprocity, characterized by punishing non-cooperators, is a proposed mechanism for maintaining cooperation.
- Third-party punishment, where individuals punish defectors who harmed others, is an effective norm enforcement strategy.
- Previous cross-cultural research indicated significant variation in punishment and cooperation across societies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between societal characteristics and third-party punishment.
- To test the hypothesis that population size and complexity predict the extent of third-party punishment.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of data from a large-scale cross-cultural project on cooperation and punishment.
- Comparative analysis of third-party punishment levels across societies of varying sizes and complexity.
Main Results:
- A significant positive correlation was found between societal size/complexity and the prevalence of third-party punishment.
- Individuals in larger, more complex societies engage in more third-party punishment than those in small-scale societies.
Conclusions:
- Societal structure, specifically population size and complexity, is a significant predictor of third-party punishment.
- Third-party punishment plays a crucial role in maintaining cooperation in larger, more complex social environments.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
01:03Altruism
Altruistic behaviors are “unselfish” behaviors—those that help another individual at the expense of the individual carrying out the behavior. Despite the negative consequences for the altruistic animal, these behaviors are thought to have evolved for several reasons.
01:55Egoism and Altruism
Voluntary behavior with the intent to help other people is called prosocial behavior. Why do people help other people? Is personal benefit such as feeling good about oneself the only reason people help one another?
00:57Inclusive Fitness
Most altruistic behavior—in which one animal helps another at a cost to themselves—occurs between relatives. Scientists think these altruistic behaviors evolved because they increase the inclusive fitness of the animal providing help.
01:27Punishment
Negative reinforcement and punishment are often confused but serve distinct functions in behavior modification. Reinforcement, whether positive or negative, increases the likelihood of a desired behavior, while punishment decreases it.
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior.
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior.
02:20Milgram's Obedience to Authority
Obedience to authority is classically demonstrated in a more famous series of social psychology experiments performed by Stanley Milgram. He was a social psychology professor at Yale who was influenced by the trial of Adolf Eichmann, a Nazi war criminal. Eichmann’s defense for the atrocities he committed was that he was “just following orders.”
03:20The Stanford Prison Experiment
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.