Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 9, 2026

Surgical Robot-Assisted Transanal Specimen Extraction Radical Sigmoidectomy Without an Auxiliary Abdominal Incision
07:22

Surgical Robot-Assisted Transanal Specimen Extraction Radical Sigmoidectomy Without an Auxiliary Abdominal Incision

Published on: June 13, 2025

Open adenomectomy: past, present and future.

Rene Sotelo Noguera1, Rafael Clavijo Rodríguez

  • 1Section of Robotic and Minimally Invasive Surgery, La Floresta Medical Institute, Caracas, Venezuela. renesotelo@cantv.net

Current Opinion in Urology
|December 20, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Editorial comment on the first hybrid transvaginal nephrectomy for renal cancer].

Actas urologicas espanolas·2009
See all related articles

Minimally invasive surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia now rivals open surgery outcomes with less morbidity. Techniques like laparoscopy and robotics are increasingly adopted, offering a promising future for treating this condition.

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Surgical Innovation
  • Minimally Invasive Procedures

Background:

  • Open surgery has historically been the standard for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).
  • Recent advancements show minimally invasive techniques can achieve comparable results to open surgery.
  • This review examines the evolution of BPH surgical treatments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review historical and current surgical techniques for benign prostatic hyperplasia.
  • To compare the advantages and disadvantages of various BPH treatment approaches.
  • To highlight the shift towards minimally invasive options.

Main Methods:

  • Review of surgical techniques for benign prostatic hyperplasia over the past century.
  • Analysis of outcomes, advantages, and disadvantages of different approaches.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 9, 2026

Surgical Robot-Assisted Transanal Specimen Extraction Radical Sigmoidectomy Without an Auxiliary Abdominal Incision
07:22

Surgical Robot-Assisted Transanal Specimen Extraction Radical Sigmoidectomy Without an Auxiliary Abdominal Incision

Published on: June 13, 2025

  • Inclusion of data on transurethral resection modifications, laser therapies, ablative techniques, laparoscopy, and robotics.

    • Main Results:

    • Surgical management evolved from open procedures to include transurethral resection (TUR) modifications like bipolar TUR, holmium laser resection, and KTP laser vaporization.
    • Minimally invasive ablative techniques such as transurethral needle ablation and thermotherapy have gained popularity.
    • Laparoscopic and robotic approaches are emerging as safe and effective alternatives to open surgery, yielding similar outcomes with reduced invasiveness.

    Conclusions:

    • Minimally invasive techniques are increasingly replacing open surgery for symptomatic benign giant prostatic hyperplasia, offering comparable efficacy with lower morbidity.
    • Laparoscopic and robotic surgery show significant promise for the popularization of minimally invasive treatment for BPH.
    • Further research and larger studies are needed to fully establish the benefits of robotic surgery.