Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Systematic reviews: a primer for plastic surgery research.

Zvi Margaliot1, Kevin C Chung

  • 1Mississauga, Ontario, Canada; and Ann Arbor, Mich. From the Division of Plastic Surgery, Trillium Health Center, and Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The University of Michigan Health System.

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
|December 20, 2007
PubMed
Summary

Systematic reviews offer a rigorous, bias-free approach to synthesizing medical literature, overcoming traditional review limitations. This guide focuses on systematic reviews for plastic surgery research, emphasizing reproducible methods for reliable evidence synthesis.

Related Concept Videos

Psychosurgery01:30

Psychosurgery

Psychosurgery, the surgical alteration or permanent removal of brain tissue to alleviate severe psychological conditions, stands as one of the most radical and controversial treatments in the history of mental health care. Its development and application have evolved significantly, marked by dramatic shifts in scientific understanding and ethical perspectives.
Historical Development of Psychosurgery
In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Antonio Egas Moniz introduced a surgical procedure designed...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Effect of Impactful Articles on Clinical Practice in the United States: Corticosteroid Injection for Patients with Lateral Epicondylitis.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2018
Same author

The Desired Role of Health Care Providers in Guiding Older Patients With Distal Radius Fractures: A Qualitative Analysis.

The Journal of hand surgery·2018
Same author

An On-Top-Plasty Reconstruction for Complicated Radial Polydactyly.

Hand (New York, N.Y.)·2018
Same author

Defining Outcomes Articles for the Journal.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2017
Same author

Use and Associated Spending for Anesthesiologist-Administered Services in Minor Hand Surgery.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2017
Same author

Antibiotic Prophylaxis after Immediate Breast Reconstruction: The Reality of Its Efficacy.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2017

Area of Science:

  • Medical Literature Synthesis
  • Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Scientific Review Methodology

Background:

  • Traditional review articles face challenges with personal bias and incomplete literature synthesis.
  • Clinicians require reliable summaries of rapidly growing medical and surgical research.
  • Systematic reviews provide a structured, scientific alternative to traditional expert reviews.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To guide readers in performing systematic reviews, particularly within plastic surgery.
  • To highlight the advantages of systematic reviews over traditional reviews.
  • To explain the principles and methods of systematic review for evidence synthesis.

Main Methods:

  • Adherence to strict, reproducible methods and recommended guidelines.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Systematic literature searches to ensure comprehensive data collection.
  • Structured presentation of results for clinical utility.

    • Main Results:

    • Systematic reviews minimize bias and ensure a more complete synthesis of existing literature.
    • Meta-analysis, a quantitative synthesis, can be included for increased precision in results.
    • The validity of meta-analysis depends on the quality of available data, often from randomized controlled trials.

    Conclusions:

    • Systematic reviews are essential for reliable medical literature synthesis.
    • The focus is on systematic reviews due to the limited availability of randomized controlled trials in plastic surgery.
    • This article serves as a practical guide for conducting systematic reviews in plastic surgery research.