Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Bone substitutes in oral surgery.

S Pappalardo1, S Puzzo, V Carlino

  • 1Unit of Dentistry and Stomatology II, Section of Dental and Stomatological Diseases, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Catania, Italy. sabr.pappalardo@tiscali.it

Minerva Stomatologica
|December 20, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Patient- and Clinician-reported Outcomes, Safety and Efficacy Profile of Tirbanibulin 1% for Actinic Keratosis Under Conditions Close to Routine Clinical Practice in Spain and Italy (TIRBASKIN Study).

Actas dermo-sifiliograficas·2026
Same author

One year of surgical mask testing at the University of Bologna labs: Lessons learned from data analysis.

Separation and purification technology·2022
Same author

Characterization of Carbon-Contaminated B<sub>4</sub>C-Coated Optics after Chemically Selective Cleaning with Low-Pressure RF Plasma.

Scientific reports·2018
Same author

Corrigendum to: EXPLOITING THE VERSATILITY OF CHOLESTEROL IN NANOPARTICLES FORMULATION (International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 511 (1) (2016) 331-340).

International journal of pharmaceutics·2017
Same author

Size and specimen-dependent strategy for x-ray micro-ct and tem correlative analysis of nervous system samples.

Scientific reports·2017
Same author

On the thermodynamic path enabling a room-temperature, laser-assisted graphite to nanodiamond transformation.

Scientific reports·2016
Same journal

Dental materials implant alloys: a X-ray fluorescence analysis on FDS76®.

Minerva stomatologica·2021
Same journal

Maryland-bridge application as a suitable technique to preserve marginal bone level of not-submerged supracrestal implants.

Minerva stomatologica·2021
Same journal

Invisalign appliance: aesthetic and efficiency.

Minerva stomatologica·2021
Same journal

WITHDRAWN: Extranodal B-cell marginal zone lymphoma arising in the context of a lympho-epithelial cyst of the parotid gland in a patient with clonal B-cell lymphocytosis: report of the first case.

Minerva stomatologica·2020
Same journal

Comparison between four different implant surface debridement methods: an in-vitro experimental study.

Minerva stomatologica·2020
Same journal

Masticatory function improvement with the use of mandibular single-implant overdentures in edentulous subjects: a systematic literature review.

Minerva stomatologica·2020
See all related articles

Bone graft substitutes offer an alternative to autologous bone, reducing patient morbidity. This review examines various biomaterials for bone regeneration, comparing their clinical and histological outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Regenerative Medicine
  • Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Background:

  • Osseous defects present significant clinical challenges requiring effective bone tissue regeneration.
  • Autologous bone grafting, the current standard, involves donor site morbidity and increased patient discomfort.
  • Bone substitute materials offer a promising alternative to overcome the limitations of autologous bone grafting.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the clinical applications of bone substitute materials.
  • To evaluate the osteoconductive and/or osteoinductive properties of available biomaterials.
  • To guide the selection of appropriate biomaterials for bone regeneration.

Main Methods:

  • Classification of bone substitute materials based on origin: allogenic, heterologous, and alloplastic.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of biomaterial characteristics, including resorption rates, chemical, and structural properties.
  • Examination of clinical and histological results from studies utilizing various bone substitute materials.

    • Main Results:

    • Bone substitute materials vary in their capacity to stimulate or support bone regeneration.
    • Allogenic, heterologous, and alloplastic materials exhibit distinct properties influencing clinical outcomes.
    • Understanding these properties is crucial for effective clinical application.

    Conclusions:

    • Bone substitute materials provide viable alternatives to autologous bone grafting for treating osseous defects.
    • The selection of biomaterials should be based on a thorough analysis of their osteoconductive and osteoinductive potential.
    • Further research comparing clinical and histological results will refine biomaterial selection for enhanced bone regeneration.