Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

CT colonography with computer-aided detection as a second reader: observer performance study.

Nicholas Petrick1, Maruf Haider, Ronald M Summers

  • 1National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering/Center for Devices and Radiological Health Joint Laboratory for the Assessment of Medical Imaging Systems, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, MD, USA.

Radiology
|December 22, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Methodological considerations for evaluating deep learning segmentation models in digital pathology whole-slide images.

Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)·2026
Same author

Physics-informed data augmentation to simulate low dose CT scans: Application to lung nodule detection.

Medical physics·2026
Same author

Detecting dataset bias in medical AI using a generalized and modality agnostic auditing approach.

NPJ digital medicine·2026
Same author

Developing an Emergency Medicine Faculty Interactive Training on Necessary Emergency Skills and Simulation (EM FITNESS) Curriculum.

AEM education and training·2026
Same author

The Performance of DeepSeek R1 and Gemini 3 in Complex Medical Scenarios: Comparative Study.

JMIRx med·2026
Same author

Data Representativeness with Hyperdimensional Computing.

Journal of imaging informatics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Erratum for: Prediction of Lobar Emphysema Progression with a CT-Based Foundational Model.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

Erratum for: Associations of MRI-derived Paraspinal IMAT and LMM with Cardiometabolic Risk Factors: Results from a German Cohort.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

Erratum for: Blue Rubber Bleb Nevus Syndrome.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

Redefining the Clinical Role of MRI in Endometrial Cancer Staging.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

To Ablate or Not to Ablate: The Colorectal Liver Metastasis Question.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

The Limits of Radiologic Categorization in Pulmonary Nonsolid Nodules.

Radiology·2026
See all related articles

Computer-aided detection (CAD) significantly improved radiologist sensitivity for identifying colorectal polyps 6 mm or larger during CT colonography. However, this gain in sensitivity came at the cost of a significant decrease in specificity.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Gastroenterology

Background:

  • Computed tomographic (CT) colonography is a key tool for colorectal cancer screening.
  • Radiologists interpret CT colonography using two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) views.
  • Computer-aided detection (CAD) systems aim to improve diagnostic accuracy by highlighting potential abnormalities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the impact of CAD as a second reader on radiologist performance in CT colonography.
  • To evaluate diagnostic accuracy using a primary 2D interpretation approach.
  • To compare radiologist performance with and without CAD assistance against optical colonoscopy as the reference standard.

Main Methods:

  • Four radiologists analyzed 60 CT colonography examinations, initially without CAD, then with CAD assistance.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Readers used 2D transverse views for initial interpretation, with 3D and multiplanar views available for problem-solving.
  • Diagnostic performance metrics, including sensitivity, specificity, and AUC, were analyzed using multireader multicase analysis.

    • Main Results:

    • CAD use resulted in a significant increase in sensitivity for detecting polyps 6 mm or larger (P < .01) and 6-9 mm (P < .02).
    • Specificity significantly decreased for polyps 6 mm or larger (P < .01).
    • Average reading time increased by approximately 62% with CAD assistance.

    Conclusions:

    • CAD as a second reader significantly enhances sensitivity for detecting clinically relevant polyps (≥6 mm) in CT colonography.
    • The improvement in sensitivity is accompanied by a significant reduction in specificity.
    • CAD's utility must be weighed against increased reading time and potential for false positives.