Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2026

Rapid Screening of HIV Reverse Transcriptase and Integrase Inhibitors
Published on: April 9, 2014
Efficacy and tolerability of long-term efavirenz plus nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors for HIV-1 infection
Karen Tashima1, Schlomo Staszewski, Mark Nelson
1Miriam Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island 02906, USA. ktashima@lifespan.org
Insights
Efavirenz-containing regimens, especially efavirenz, zidovudine, and lamivudine, show superior long-term efficacy in HIV therapy compared to indinavir-based treatments. These efavirenz regimens offer better viral suppression and tolerability for patients initiating highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART).
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Virology
- Clinical Pharmacology
Background:
- Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy (HAART) is crucial for managing Human Immunodeficiency Virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection.
- Efavirenz and indinavir are key antiretroviral drugs used in HAART regimens.
- Long-term comparative data on the efficacy and tolerability of different initial HAART regimens are essential for clinical decision-making.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the long-term efficacy and tolerability of two efavirenz-containing regimens against an indinavir-containing regimen for initial HIV-1 treatment.
- To evaluate viral load reduction and CD4 cell count increases over 168 weeks of therapy.
- To assess the rates and causes of treatment discontinuation, particularly adverse events.
Main Methods:
- A randomized trial involving 1266 HIV-1 infected patients with viral loads >10,000 copies/mL and CD4 counts ≥50 cells/µL.
- Patients were assigned to one of three regimens: efavirenz/zidovudine/lamivudine; efavirenz/indinavir; or indinavir/zidovudine/lamivudine.
- The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving a viral load <400 copies/mL at 168 weeks.
Main Results:
- Response rates at 168 weeks were 48% for efavirenz/zidovudine/lamivudine, 40% for efavirenz/indinavir, and 30% for indinavir/zidovudine/lamivudine (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0018, respectively).
- Median CD4 cell counts increased by 292-300 cells/µL across regimens.
- Discontinuation rates were 54% (EFV/ZDV/3TC), 63% (EFV/IDV), and 69% (IDV/ZDV/3TC), with adverse events causing 13%, 12%, and 26% of discontinuations, respectively.
Conclusions:
- Efavirenz-containing regimens, particularly efavirenz/zidovudine/lamivudine, demonstrate significantly superior long-term antiviral activity compared to indinavir/zidovudine/lamivudine.
- These efavirenz-based regimens also show improved tolerability, leading to fewer treatment discontinuations due to adverse events.
- The findings support the use of efavirenz-containing regimens for initial HAART in HIV-1 infected patients.
Objective:
To compare the long-term efficacy and tolerability of two efavirenz-containing regimens with those of an indinavir-containing regimen in the initial use of HAART.
Method:
HIV-1-infected patients (N = 1266) were randomly assigned to receive one of three regimens: efavirenz, zidovudine plus lamivudine, n = 422; efavirenz plus indinavir, n = 429; or indinavir, zidovudine plus lamivudine, n = 415. Entrance criteria included baseline viral load greater than 10 000 copies/ml HIV-1 RNA, CD4 cell count 50 cells/mul or greater, and no previous use of lamivudine, any non-nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor or protease inhibitor. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients (response rate) in each regimen with a viral load under 400 copies/ml at 168 weeks of treatment.
Results:
Response rates at 168 weeks were 30% in the indinavir, zidovudine, lamivudine group, 48% in the efavirenz, zidovudine, lamivudine group (P < 0.0001, difference estimate; 97.5% confidence interval (CI) 18.5; 10.9, 26), and 40% in the efavirenz plus indinavir group (P = 0.0018, difference estimate; 97.5% CI 10.2; 2.9, 17.6). Median CD4 cell counts increased above respective baselines by 292 cells/mul (efavirenz, zidovudine, lamivudine and indinavir, zidovudine, lamivudine) and 300 cells/mul (efavirenz plus indinavir). Total discontinuations were 54% (efavirenz, zidovudine, lamivudine), 63% (efavirenz plus indinavir), and 69% (indinavir, zidovudine, lamivudine) of which 13, 12 and 26%, respectively, were caused by adverse events. No new or unexpected increases in the rates or severity of adverse events occurred from long-term treatment with efavirenz-containing regimens.
Conclusion:
Long-term HIV therapy with efavirenz-containing regimens, particularly efavirenz, zidovudine, lamivudine, provides significantly greater antiviral activity and tolerability than a regimen of indinavir, zidovudine plus lamivudine.
More Related Videos
10:29Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
Published on: May 9, 2025
12:03Evaluation of the Efficacy And Toxicity of RNAs Targeting HIV-1 Production for Use in Gene or Drug Therapy
Published on: September 5, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Retrovirus Life Cycles
Antiviral Nucleoside Inhibitors
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Inhibitors of Viral Protein Synthesis
Retroviruses
Pulmonary Tuberculosis V
Latent tuberculosis infection occurs when TB bacteria are present in a person's body, but are not causing illness or symptoms. It is not contagious, and preventive treatment is crucial to avoid the progression...