Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2026

08:49
External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?
Published on: June 6, 2020
Timing of planned repeated caesarean section: an enigma
H Abouzeid1, D Aggarwal, F De Graaf
1Princess Alexandra Hospital, Harlow, UK. SPRHAbouzeid@aol.com
Summary
Obstetricians often prefer planned caesarean sections after 39 weeks for patients with prior deliveries. However, some opt for earlier timing with multiple previous caesarean sections or classical scars.
Area of Science:
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Maternal-Fetal Medicine
Background:
- Timing of planned caesarean sections in women with previous caesarean deliveries is a critical clinical decision.
- Current guidelines and evidence for optimal timing in complex cases remain debated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate current trends among UK obstetric consultants regarding the preferred gestational age for planned caesarean sections.
- To explore variations in timing based on the number of previous caesarean deliveries and scar type.
Main Methods:
- A questionnaire survey was distributed to 129 consultant obstetricians and gynaecologists in the UK.
- The survey collected data on preferred gestational age for elective caesarean sections in specific patient groups.
Main Results:
- A high percentage of consultants (93.6%) preferred 39 weeks or later for one previous caesarean.
- Preferences shifted earlier for multiple (71.3%) or classical (35.9%) caesarean scars.
- A notable proportion of obstetricians plan earlier elective caesarean sections (<39 weeks) for patients with three or more previous abdominal deliveries or a classical scar.
Conclusions:
- Significant variation exists in the timing of planned caesarean sections among obstetricians for women with prior caesarean deliveries.
- While evidence for early intervention in multiple prior caesareans is limited, some support exists for classical caesarean scars.
- Further research, including randomized controlled trials, is needed to establish best practices for these patient populations.

