Related Experiment Videos
Sleep quality subtypes in midlife women
J L Shaver1, E Giblin, V Paulsen
1Department of Physiological Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle 98195.
Sleep
|February 1, 1991
Summary
Midlife women reporting poor sleep experienced higher psychological distress, even without objective sleep issues. Objective sleep measures revealed differences, but not psychological distress, when solely considering sleep efficiency.
Area of Science:
- Sleep Science
- Psychology
- Midlife Health
Background:
- Sleep disturbances are common in midlife women.
- Subjective and objective sleep measures may not always align.
- Psychological distress can impact perceived sleep quality.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare somnographic, psychological, and somatic variables between good and poor sleepers in midlife women.
- To investigate discrepancies between self-reported sleep quality and objective sleep efficiency index (SEI).
- To identify subgroups based on combined subjective and objective sleep classifications.
Main Methods:
- Eighty-two midlife women (40-59 years) were classified as poor or good sleepers using self-report and SEI.
- Sleep variables (wakefulness, fragmentation) were assessed somnographically.
- Psychological distress (SCL-90) and somatic symptoms were evaluated.
Main Results:
- Self-reported poor sleepers showed higher psychological distress than good sleepers, irrespective of somnographic data.
- SEI-classified poor sleepers differed in somnographic variables but not psychological distress.
- A subgroup (15%) perceived poor sleep without objective evidence, exhibiting the highest psychological distress.
Conclusions:
- Subjective perception of poor sleep in midlife women is strongly linked to psychological distress, even without objective findings.
- Objective sleep measures (SEI) identify distinct sleep architecture differences but not necessarily higher psychological distress.
- A significant portion of midlife women may experience distress related to perceived poor sleep, highlighting the importance of addressing both subjective and objective aspects.