Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Failure to advise.

M G Harris1

  • 1University of California, School of Optometry, Berkeley 94720.

Journal of the American Optometric Association
|November 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Healthcare providers may face medical malpractice claims if they do not advise patients on necessary follow-up care for worsening symptoms. This case highlights expanded legal duties for physicians regarding patient monitoring and treatment adherence.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comorbidity within mental disorders: a comprehensive analysis based on 145 990 survey respondents from 27 countries.

Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences·2020
Same author

Perceived need and barriers to adolescent mental health care: agreement between adolescents and their parents.

Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences·2019
Same author

A profile of Australian mental health carers, their caring role and service needs: results from the 2012 Survey of Disability, Ageing and Carers.

Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences·2018
Same author

The risk of developing major depression among individuals with subthreshold depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies.

Psychological medicine·2018
Same author

Deterioration of visuospatial associative memory following a first psychotic episode: a long-term follow-up study.

Psychological medicine·2017
Same author

Intersectoral policy for severe and persistent mental illness: review of approaches in a sample of high-income countries.

Global mental health (Cambridge, England)·2017
Same journal

Visual skills profiles.

Journal of the American Optometric Association·2014
Same journal

Dark adaptation and night blindness.

Journal of the American Optometric Association·2014
Same journal

Scleral tonometry.

Journal of the American Optometric Association·2014
Same journal

Staying in shape: the different roads to fitness for busy optometrists.

Journal of the American Optometric Association·2000
Same journal

Hiring a new optometrist? Be prepared!

Journal of the American Optometric Association·2000
Same journal

Late traumatic intraocular lens extrusion after penetrating keratoplasty.

Journal of the American Optometric Association·2000
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Medical Law
  • Healthcare Practitioner Duties
  • Patient Safety

Background:

  • Medical malpractice law governs healthcare provider negligence.
  • Patient follow-up is crucial for effective treatment and monitoring.
  • Previous legal standards may not have fully encompassed ongoing patient assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze a recent Massachusetts case expanding medical malpractice liability.
  • To discuss the legal requirements for healthcare practitioners regarding patient follow-up.
  • To explore the implications of this expanded liability for medical professionals.

Main Methods:

  • Case law analysis of a specific Massachusetts medical malpractice ruling.
  • Discussion of relevant legal theories, including negligence.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of the practical and legal implications for healthcare providers.

    • Main Results:

    • Healthcare practitioners can be held liable for negligence if they fail to recommend follow-up evaluations for persistent or worsening symptoms.
    • The case broadens the scope of duty owed by physicians to patients.
    • Failure to advise on necessary follow-up constitutes a breach of care.

    Conclusions:

    • Physicians have a heightened legal obligation to ensure patients receive appropriate follow-up care.
    • This expanded concept of medical malpractice emphasizes proactive patient management.
    • Healthcare providers must diligently document and communicate follow-up recommendations to mitigate risk.