Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 8, 2026

In Situ Isolation and Culturing of Recalcitrant Soil Bacteria using an Isolation Chip (iChip)
Published on: August 6, 2025
[Comparison between blood culture and in-situ hybridization of bacteria]
Miki Takahashi1, Sachie Yomoda, Ryuuichi Hosoya
1Department of Clinical Laboratory Center, Gunma University Hospital, Maebashi.
Abstract:
We compared blood culture and in situ hybridization method (Hybrisep) to detect bacteria in blood samples. One thousand and two hundred and sixty nine blood culture samples were tested in 2003 in our hospital. One hundred and sixty seven samples (13.1%) were positive for bacteria. Total number of detected bacteria was 178. Of 178 bacteria, 49.4% was gram positive, 32.6% was gram negative, 13.5% was Candida spp., and 4.5% was anaerobic. Twenty five samples were tested with both blood culture and Hybrisep. Three samples were positive for both methods, and 13 samples were negative for both methods. The identical results were obtained in 64% of samples. Although the microscopic determination of positive signals in Hybrisep requires trained skills, Hybrisep may be a rapid and sensitive method providing valuable information to diagnose sepsis with an automated equipment and an increased number of probes.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
In-situ Hybridization
Types of probes and labels
A probe is a complementary strand of DNA or RNA that binds to corresponding nucleotide sequences in a cell. Many...
FISH - Fluorescent In-situ Hybridization
Techniques for Isolation of Pure Cultures
Methods of Classification and Identification

