Search research articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Proxy consent and counterfactuals.

Yujin Nagasawa¹

¹Department of Philosophy, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom. Y.Nagasawa@bham.ac.uk

|December 25, 2007

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Subjective character of experience in medical ethics: a reply to Atkins.

Journal of applied philosophy·2004

Same journal

Capable, Unbearably Suffering, and Excluded: People With Mental Illness and the Ethics of Canada's Assisted-Dying Regime.

Bioethics·2026

Same journal

Transhumanism Without Transindividuation in the Age Without Epochality: Stiegler, Vice, and Radical Human Enhancement.

Bioethics·2026

Same journal

Between Safeguard and Constraint: Navigating Patient Autonomy in Protective Laws for Medical Assistance in Dying.

Bioethics·2026

Same journal

Bioethics of Space Exploration: Life, Risk, and Responsibility Beyond Earth.

Bioethics·2026

Same journal

The Concept of Harm in Medical Ethics.

Bioethics·2026

Same journal

On the Destruction and Humanitarianisation of the Health System in Gaza and the Need for a Biopolitical Bioethics.

Bioethics·2026

See all related articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Surrogate consent for patients in vegetative states relies on the substituted judgment thesis. This paper reveals limitations of this thesis in determining the validity of proxy consent for device termination.

Area of Science:

Bioethics
Philosophy of Law
Medical Ethics

Background:

Patients in vegetative states often require life-sustaining medical devices.
Surrogates may provide proxy consent to terminate these devices.
Courts frequently use the substituted judgment thesis for proxy consent validity.

Purpose of the Study:

To identify and explain a significant limitation of the substituted judgment thesis.
To demonstrate how this limitation affects the validity of proxy consents.
To analyze the metaphysical underpinnings of counterfactuals in legal and ethical decision-making.

Main Methods:

Philosophical analysis of the substituted judgment thesis.
Examination of the metaphysics of counterfactual statements.

Related Experiment Videos

Case study analysis of actual proxy consent scenarios.

Main Results:

The substituted judgment thesis has a hitherto unrecognized limitation.
This limitation stems from the metaphysical nature of counterfactuals.
The thesis fails to definitively determine proxy consent validity in certain cases.

Conclusions:

The substituted judgment thesis, as currently applied, is insufficient.
A deeper understanding of counterfactual metaphysics is needed.
Re-evaluation of legal and ethical frameworks for surrogate consent is warranted.