Technical factors affecting autogenous vein graft failure: observations from a large multicenter trial
Andres Schanzer1, Nathanael Hevelone, Christopher D Owens
1Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Vein diameter and conduit type significantly impact lower extremity bypass graft success. Smaller veins and certain graft types increase failure risk, necessitating closer monitoring for high-risk conduits.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Surgical Outcomes Research
- Biomaterials Science
Background:
- Operator-dependent variables in lower extremity bypass (LEB) surgery outcomes are typically from single-institution retrospective studies.
- A prospective, multicenter trial offers a robust platform to identify technical factors influencing autogenous LEB for limb salvage.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify technical variables significantly associated with early and midterm results of autogenous LEB for limb salvage.
- To analyze the impact of specific technical factors on graft patency and patient outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Utilized data from the PREVENT III trial, including 1404 North American patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) undergoing LEB with autogenous vein.
- Analyzed technical factors: vein diameter, conduit type, graft length, anastomosis location, and completion imaging.
- Employed univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses to assess effects on 30-day and 1-year outcomes (primary patency, primary assisted patency, secondary patency), adjusting for patient comorbidities.
Main Results:
- Vein diameter less than 3.5 mm and composite graft types were linked to early graft failure.
- At 1 year, smaller diameter (<3.5 mm), non-great saphenous vein (GSV) types, and longer grafts (>50 cm) were associated with reduced patency rates.
- High-risk conduits (diameter <3 mm or non-single segment GSV) increased 30-day graft failure risk by 2.1-fold and led to more reinterventions and longer hospital stays.
Conclusions:
- Vein diameter and conduit type are primary technical determinants of early and late graft failure in LEB for CLI.
- High-risk conduits and longer grafts warrant aggressive postoperative surveillance to improve outcomes.
More Related Videos
09:04Synergizing Antegrade Endoscopic with Bridging Vein Harvesting for Improvement of Great Saphenous Vein Graft Quality from the Lower Leg
Published on: November 19, 2019
13:58A Rabbit Model of Durable Transgene Expression in Jugular Vein to Common Carotid Artery Interposition Grafts
Published on: September 10, 2018
