Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 8, 2026

Emergency Undocking in Robotic Surgery: A Simulation Curriculum

Emergency Undocking in Robotic Surgery: A Simulation Curriculum

Published on: May 20, 2018

Trauma scissors vs. the rescue hook, exposing a simulated patient: a pilot study.

Timothy R Hurtado¹, Chris Montoya

¹Forward Support Medical Company, 2nd Forward Support Battalion, 2nd Brigade Combat Team, 2nd Infantry Division, US Army, Camp Ramadi, Iraq.

The Journal of Emergency Medicine

|December 25, 2007

Summary

The rescue hook significantly reduces clothing removal time on simulated patients compared to trauma scissors. Most participants preferred the rescue hook for its speed and ease of use in emergency scenarios.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Predicting response to immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer- from bench to bedside.

Frontiers in oncology·2023

Same author

Para-Aortic Radiation Therapy for Oligorecurrent Prostate Cancer.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2022

Same author

Validation of the Simplified Motor Score in the out-of-hospital setting for the prediction of outcomes after traumatic brain injury.

Annals of emergency medicine·2011

Same author

Right lower quadrant pain in an adult woman.

The American journal of emergency medicine·2010

Same author

Search and rescue activity on Denali, 1990 to 2008.

Wilderness & environmental medicine·2010

Same author

Echelon I interventions and triage are effective and concordant with echelon II care in combat operations.

Military medicine·2009

Area of Science:

Emergency medicine
Trauma care
Medical device evaluation

Background:

Rapid patient assessment and intervention are critical in emergency situations.
Standardized tools are essential for efficient pre-hospital and emergency department care.
Evaluating the effectiveness of different medical tools can improve patient outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

To compare the time efficiency of rescue hooks versus trauma scissors for simulated patient exposure.
To assess participant preference and perceived usability of each instrument.

Main Methods:

A prospectively randomized, parallel group comparison study.
Ten participants were trained on both rescue hooks and trauma scissors.
Exposure times were recorded over 15 standardized cycles for each instrument on a simulated patient.

More Related Videos

A Novel Technique of Rescuing Capsulorhexis Radial Tear-out using a Cystotome

A Novel Technique of Rescuing Capsulorhexis Radial Tear-out using a Cystotome

Published on: January 16, 2011

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 8, 2026

Emergency Undocking in Robotic Surgery: A Simulation Curriculum

Emergency Undocking in Robotic Surgery: A Simulation Curriculum

Published on: May 20, 2018

A Novel Technique of Rescuing Capsulorhexis Radial Tear-out using a Cystotome

A Novel Technique of Rescuing Capsulorhexis Radial Tear-out using a Cystotome

Published on: January 16, 2011

Main Results:

The rescue hook demonstrated a mean exposure time of 24 seconds (SD 7s), significantly faster than trauma scissors (42 seconds, SD 5s).
The rescue hook was 43% faster on average, with a mean difference of 18 seconds.
Nine out of ten participants preferred the rescue hook, citing its speed, ease of use, size, and durability.

Conclusions:

The rescue hook is a more time-efficient tool than trauma scissors for exposing simulated patients.
The rescue hook is the preferred instrument among participants due to its performance and usability characteristics.
Findings suggest the rescue hook may enhance efficiency in emergency medical interventions.