Related Experiment Videos
Titration patterns with rosuvastatin as compared with other statins in clinical practice: a retrospective
Kathleen M Fox1, Sanjay K Gandhi, Robert L Ohsfeldt
1Department of Epidemiology & Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA. kathyfox@comcast.net
Insights
Rosuvastatin patients achieving cholesterol goals required less dose adjustment compared to those on other statins. This suggests a potentially more efficient lipid-lowering effect with rosuvastatin in routine practice.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Practice
Background:
- Suboptimal lipid management is common, with many patients not reaching cholesterol targets.
- Limited upward dose titration of statins may contribute to low goal attainment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the rate of dose titration in patients achieving low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals on rosuvastatin versus other statins in routine clinical practice.
- To investigate if rosuvastatin use is associated with lower titration rates among patients meeting National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP III) LDL-C goals.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of a US database of patients (aged ≥18) newly prescribed statins between August 2003 and May 2005.
- Comparison of upward titration rates between rosuvastatin and other statins (atorvastatin, simvastatin, pravastatin, lovastatin) in patients achieving NCEP ATP III LDL-C goals.
- Multivariate logistic regression adjusted for baseline LDL-C, coronary heart disease risk, treatment duration, and goal attainment.
Main Results:
- Of 5955 eligible patients, 72.8% attained their LDL-C goal.
- Patients achieving LDL-C goals on rosuvastatin (8.3%) showed significantly lower titration rates compared to those on atorvastatin (17.0%), simvastatin (20.0%), pravastatin (20.7%), and lovastatin (23.5%).
- Adjusted analysis confirmed that patients on other statins were more likely to be titrated than rosuvastatin users (ORs 2.0-3.3).
Conclusions:
- Rosuvastatin users who achieved NCEP ATP III LDL-C goals demonstrated significantly lower dose titration rates compared to users of other statins.
- This finding suggests a potentially more efficient titration profile for rosuvastatin in achieving and maintaining LDL-C goals in clinical practice.
Background:
Lipid management in clinical practice has been suboptimal with a significant proportion of patients not achieving recommended cholesterol levels. A reason for low goal attainment may be the limited use of upward dose titration.
Objective:
The aim of this study was to determine if, in routine clinical practice, a lower rate of titration is observed among rosuvastatin patients who achieved the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP III) target low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals as compared with patients achieving the target LDL-C goals on other statins.
Methods:
This retrospective database study included the patients, aged > or =18 years, of approximately 3000 physicians across the United States, who were newly prescribed statin treatment from August 2003 to May 2005. Patients were excluded if they started on a maximum dose of statin, were at LDL-C goal at baseline (no clinical reason for titrating), or on fluvastatin (<70 patients). Titration rate with rosuvastatin was compared with other statins. Multivariate logistic regression models adjusted for baseline LDL-C, coronary heart disease risk, treatment duration, and target LDL-C goal attainment.
Results:
This study assessed 12,041 patients for upward titration. Of the 5955 eligible patients (mean age, 63 years; male, 47%), 7.2% were prescribed rosuvastatin, 63.5% atorvastatin, 15.3% simvastatin, 7.2% pravastatin, and 6.9% lovastatin. Overall, 4337 patients (72.8%) attained the NCEP ATP III target LDL-C goal. Mean duration of statin treatment was 188 days for rosuvastatin compared with 238 to 260 days for the other statins (all, P < 0.05). Among patients attaining the target LDL-C goal, significantly fewer rosuvastatin patients (8.3%) had titration compared with atorvastatin (17.0%), simvastatin (20.0%), pravastatin (20.7%), and lovastatin (23.5%) (all, P < 0.05). After adjusting for baseline characteristics, patients attaining the target LDL-C goal on other statins were significantly more likely to be titrated as compared with rosuvastatin (odds ratios, 2.0-3.3; P < 0.05). Lower titration rates for rosuvastatin patients were also observed in the total population (P < 0.05).
Conclusion:
Our study found that rosuvastatin patients who attained the NCEP ATP III target LDL-C goal had significantly lower titration rates than patients receiving other statins.
Related Concept Videos
Lipid-Lowering Drugs: Statins and Miscellaneous Agents
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Bioavailability Study Design: Absolute Versus Relative Bioavailability
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Affecting Factors
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies
Pharmacokinetics in Geriatric Patients: Effect of Age on Drug Metabolism