Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Heuristics01:21

Heuristics

Heuristics are problem-solving strategies that use mental shortcuts to simplify decision-making. Unlike algorithms, which must be followed precisely to achieve a correct result, heuristics offer a general problem-solving framework. They save time and energy but can sometimes lead to less rational decisions.
People often rely on heuristics when faced with an overload of information, limited time, low importance of the decision, limited information, or when a heuristic readily comes to mind. For...
Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in different ways based on the...
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Multi-ontology sense making: a new simplicity in decision making.

Informatics in primary care·2005
Same author

Intramolecular carbolithiation reactions of chiral alpha-amino-organolithium species.

Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)·2002
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 8, 2026

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

A leader's framework for decision making. A leader's framework for decision making.

David J Snowden1, Mary E Boone

  • 1Cognitive Edge, Lockeridge, England. snowded@mac.com

Harvard Business Review
|December 28, 2007
PubMed
Summary

Effective leadership requires adapting strategies to situational contexts. The Cynefin framework helps leaders identify five contexts—Simple, Complicated, Complex, Chaotic, and Disorder—to guide decision-making and response.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 8, 2026

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Complexity Science
  • Leadership Studies
  • Decision Making

Background:

  • Traditional leadership models often fail in novel situations due to a lack of contextual awareness.
  • Executives need to recognize that different contexts demand distinct leadership approaches.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Introduce the Cynefin framework as a novel perspective on leadership and decision-making.
  • Provide a method for leaders to categorize situations and tailor their responses accordingly.

Main Methods:

  • The Cynefin framework categorizes issues into five contexts: Simple, Complicated, Complex, Chaotic, and Disorder.
  • Each context is defined by distinct characteristics of cause-and-effect clarity and knowledge availability.
  • Specific leadership actions (sense, analyze, probe, act) are recommended for each context.

Main Results:

  • Simple contexts: Sense, categorize, respond (known knowns).
  • Complicated contexts: Sense, analyze, respond (known unknowns).
  • Complex contexts: Probe, sense, respond (unknown unknowns).
  • Chaotic contexts: Act, sense, transform (unknowables).
  • Disorder: Break down the problem and assign to other contexts.

Conclusions:

  • Contextual awareness is crucial for effective leadership and decision-making.
  • The Cynefin framework offers a practical tool for navigating diverse and dynamic situations.
  • Tailoring leadership actions to specific contexts enhances problem-solving and strategic response.