Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Direct surface pH determinations of setting cements.

D G Charlton1, B K Moore, M L Swartz

  • 1Department of Dental Materials, Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indianapolis 46202.

Operative Dentistry
|November 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Differentiated service delivery for TB treatment.

The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease·2026
Same author

Evidence for the Collective Nature of Radial Flow in Pb+Pb Collisions with the ATLAS Detector.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Evidence for the Dimuon Decay of the Higgs Boson in pp Collisions with the ATLAS Detector.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Evidence for Longitudinally Polarized W Bosons in the Electroweak Production of Same-Sign W Boson Pairs in Association with Two Jets in pp Collisions at sqrt[s]=13  TeV with the ATLAS Detector.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Observation of tt[over ¯] Production in Pb+Pb Collisions at sqrt[s_{NN}]=5.02  TeV with the ATLAS Detector.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Search for Dark Matter Produced in Association with a Dark Higgs Boson in the bb[over ¯] Final State Using pp Collisions at sqrt[s]=13  TeV with the ATLAS Detector.

Physical review letters·2025
Same journal

Effects of Light Curing on the Mechanical Properties and Shade Stability of a Dual-Cure Bulk-Fill Resin Composite.

Operative dentistry·2026
Same journal

Vital Pulp Preservation and Restorative Treatment for Young Permanent Incisors with Complicated Crown-Root Fractures: A Case Report.

Operative dentistry·2026
Same journal

Bonding Performance of a Bisphenol A-Free Universal Adhesive to Sound and Caries-Affected Dentin.

Operative dentistry·2026
Same journal

Rate of Initial Proximal Caries Lesion Progression in High Caries-Risk Adults.

Operative dentistry·2026
Same journal

Effect of Intracoronal Barrier Location on Bleaching Efficacy and Peroxide Diffusion.

Operative dentistry·2026
Same journal

Surface, Colorimetric, and Optical Properties of New-Generation Lithium Disilicate Ceramics.

Operative dentistry·2026
See all related articles

The study measured the surface pH of dental materials over 24 hours. Water-mixed glass-ionomer cements exhibited lower pH, potentially causing post-treatment sensitivity.

Area of Science:

  • Dental Materials Science
  • Biomaterials Chemistry

Background:

  • Dental cements and liners are crucial for restorations.
  • Understanding their surface pH is vital for biocompatibility and patient comfort.
  • Acidity of materials can impact surrounding tooth structure and cause sensitivity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To measure and compare the surface pH of various luting cements and glass-ionomer lining/restorative materials over a 24-hour period.
  • To investigate the relationship between material type, pH, and potential clinical implications like post-treatment sensitivity.

Main Methods:

  • Surface pH was monitored for 24 hours for multiple dental materials.
  • Materials included water-mixed glass-ionomer luting cements, polycarboxylate cements, and glass-ionomer lining/restorative materials.

Related Experiment Videos

  • pH measurements were taken at intervals throughout the 24-hour testing duration.
  • Main Results:

    • Ketac-Cem (water-mixed glass-ionomer) showed the lowest initial pH, while Durelon (polycarboxylate) had the highest.
    • Significant pH differences emerged over 24 hours for three glass-ionomer lining materials.
    • Two visible-light-cured glass-ionomer liners had similar pH, but a third displayed a considerably lower pH.

    Conclusions:

    • Water-mixed glass-ionomer luting agents demonstrate lower surface pH values.
    • The acidity of these materials may be a contributing factor to post-treatment sensitivity experienced by patients.
    • Material selection and understanding pH profiles are important for clinical success and patient management.